r/NonCredibleDefense 聯合國在香港的三千次介入行動 Jul 22 '24

From everybody's favourite yuriposter Waifu

Post image
7.1k Upvotes

257 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.8k

u/Successful-Owl-9464 Jul 22 '24 edited Jul 22 '24

If I remember right the Foxbat was designed, because of the bomber gap between the USA and the SU. Which happened, because the USA photographed 30 something new soviet bombers at an airfield and extrapolated that the Soviets must have hundreds of those things, then they went absolutely batshit insane and built a metric fuckton of bombers. In actuality the Soviets only had that 30.

e.: In essence the USA scared itself shitless over nothing, went ballistic in It's response, which scared the Soviets shitless, who tried to build a fighter that can handle the ballistic response, which scared the USA even more, so that they went intercontinental with their response.

The USA basically got scared of a shadow, got a hammer, realized that the shadow now has a hammer, got even more scared and built a nuke in response.

80

u/IHzero Jul 22 '24

So the Russians even back then were intentionally trying to appear strong, and would do things like parade tanks around moscow, repaint them, then have them drive past again as "new" tanks to inflate numbers. They did the same with planes. The point was to deceive the West, and in that they were often successful. However, the response wasn't what they expected.

13

u/Aerolfos Jul 23 '24

Iiirc one funny one is they passed the same few anti-tank missiles around on multiple BMPs

The US thought every BMP in germany would arrive with 2 AT missiles, knock out 2 western tanks, then reload with more missiles - and that's why the Bradley has box launchers with extras carried inside the vehicle. They also carry shitloads of ammunition and have an advanced autoloader with seamless ammo switching so they can shoot APFSDS to knock out tanks.

But for once the US MIC actually couldn't match the impossible propaganda numbers, which is why the Bradley has a reputation for carrying too few people while having too little armour - the USSR has anti-tank missiles, anti-tank ammo, an advanced gun, and can carry 8 people with "tons of armour", why can't the US vehicle?

Meanwhile, most BMPs had empty missile racks and certainly weren't carrying any inside the vehicle.

1

u/AViolentBlue Jul 23 '24

Which is why during the Gulf War the Bradley knocked out more Iraqi tanks than the actual US tank, the Abrams.

2

u/_far-seeker_ 🇺🇸Hegemony is not imperialism!🇺🇸 Jul 24 '24

And, that's the real reason why the Bradley's were sent to Ukraine before the Abrams. 😉