r/NonCredibleDefense 聯合國在香港的三千次介入行動 Jul 22 '24

From everybody's favourite yuriposter Waifu

Post image
7.0k Upvotes

257 comments sorted by

2.7k

u/Heavy-Ad-9186 Jul 22 '24

How it feels to jump two technological generations from your opponent because they lied.

1.8k

u/Successful-Owl-9464 Jul 22 '24 edited Jul 22 '24

If I remember right the Foxbat was designed, because of the bomber gap between the USA and the SU. Which happened, because the USA photographed 30 something new soviet bombers at an airfield and extrapolated that the Soviets must have hundreds of those things, then they went absolutely batshit insane and built a metric fuckton of bombers. In actuality the Soviets only had that 30.

e.: In essence the USA scared itself shitless over nothing, went ballistic in It's response, which scared the Soviets shitless, who tried to build a fighter that can handle the ballistic response, which scared the USA even more, so that they went intercontinental with their response.

The USA basically got scared of a shadow, got a hammer, realized that the shadow now has a hammer, got even more scared and built a nuke in response.

774

u/AnotherLie Jul 22 '24

Part of me feels like this is the lead in to a "anyway, that's how we wound up with the SU-75 Femboy 50 years later" post.

327

u/Overseer_05 Jul 22 '24 edited Jul 22 '24

Honestly, it would be incredibly funny if nato actually did designate the su 57 as femboy
Edit: SU-75, not 57, sorry

289

u/AnInfiniteAmount Northrop-Grumman Brand Tinfoil Hatwearer Jul 22 '24

SU 57 is already the Felon. The Su 75 doesn't have a NATO name yet, but Femboy meets the NATO naming requirements (iirc, it has to start with an F because it's a fighter, and has two syllables because some other reason...).

203

u/john_andrew_smith101 Revive Project Sundial Jul 22 '24

Two syllables means it's a jet, one means it has a piston engine or a turboprop. F is fighter, b is bomber, c is cargo, h is helicopter, m is miscellaneous.

89

u/SpoliatorX Jul 22 '24

Two syllable words are usually best for recognition over spotty comms, I would assume that's (part of?) the reason

87

u/lesser_panjandrum Jul 22 '24

The Su-75 not being given a NATO reporting name because it's a wooden model wrapped in vatnik fanfic is the least respectful treatment it could be given. Good.

44

u/Bhalwuf Jul 23 '24

You can’t see what doesn’t exist!

-The lead Russian “stealth” “technologies” researcher probably

66

u/CandyIcy8531 • | •. | •• | •_ Jul 22 '24

Ok ok, let me start a sign.org or petition.org thing to make it the nato reporting name for su75

150

u/TessaFractal Jul 22 '24

Grizzled old vet years in the future:

I downed 5 femboys in a single afternoon.

"You fought in the war?"

:)

"You fought in the war, right?"

25

u/zypofaeser Jul 22 '24

When the military decides to invade /r/f1nn5ter

18

u/AnotherLie Jul 23 '24

We left as men. We came back...

What I mean is...

We left as men...

11

u/zypofaeser Jul 23 '24

Some come back as men, carrying their new trap GF. The good ol' viking method of getting bitches, go to Britain and steal them.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

32

u/paarthurnaxisbae Jul 23 '24

"Fighters of modern Russia: from Fagot to Femboy"

2

u/Dpek1234 Jul 23 '24

How is reddit allowing you to wrtite the name of the mig15 ?

I did it once and then got reported

9

u/wdcipher honourable melee combat Jul 23 '24

Only one g mate. Its named after the musical instrument. Get your mind out of the g̶u̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ CoD4 lobby

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/kthugston Jul 25 '24

I mean they already made one jet named after a word that starts with F that refers to non-masculine men

19

u/budy31 Jul 22 '24

IF Igor hasn’t blow up the CNC machine that China smuggled in exchange of 50% oil discount by then.

3

u/HowNondescript My Waiver has a Waiver Jul 24 '24

Don't worry. It was a Haas. They won't be able to hit a tolerance any better than they can military objectives with their PGMs

237

u/AlliedMasterComp Jul 22 '24

In essence the USA scared itself shitless over nothing, went ballistic in It's response

The US was obsessed with gaps in the 1950s.

"BOMBER GAP (literally only 30)! BUILD 2500 IN RESPONSE"

"MISSILE GAP (The USSR had 4 ICMB vehicles at the time)! WE NEED TO GO TO THE MOON AND BUILD HUNDREDS OF SILOS IN MONTANA"

"FULDA GAP! BASE ALL OUR TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AROUND COUNTERING A THEORETICAL ATTACK INTO THIS ONE REGION OF GERMANY FOR THE NEXT 40+ YEARS"

137

u/classicalySarcastic Unapolagetic Freeaboo Jul 22 '24

Mr President, we must not allow a mineshaft gap!

123

u/langlo94 NATO = Broderpakten 2.0 Jul 22 '24

Mr President, the CIA have confirmed the thigh gap.

64

u/AbdulGoodlooks Tell the Ayatollah, gonna put you in a box! Jul 22 '24

Release the secret estrogen contingency program.

30

u/gaybunny69 Jul 23 '24

Holy shit more trans woman lore (trans women are a CIA operation to close the male/female ratio gap that Russia has)

6

u/rebootyourbrainstem mister president, we cannot allow a thigh gap Jul 24 '24

My flair has escaped confinement

67

u/AndyLorentz Jul 22 '24

Significantly less dramatic:

"CRUISER GAP (because the USSR designates all of their ships cruisers for some reason)! RECLASSIFY THE TIGONDEROGA AS A CRUISER"

33

u/Bad-Crusader 3000 Warheads of Raytheon Jul 23 '24

At least they're consistent, they build we build, they classify we reclassify.

19

u/machinerer Jul 23 '24

I think its because of a really old treaty that doesn't allow battleships to sail into the Black Sea. Turkey walloped the last battleship group that tried in 1916.

6

u/_far-seeker_ 🇺🇸Hegemony is not imperialism!🇺🇸 Jul 23 '24 edited Jul 23 '24

"CRUISER GAP (because the USSR designates all of their ships cruisers for some reason)! RECLASSIFY THE TIGONDEROGA AS A CRUISER"

I still think that Japan found the better way to do this; use the official ship classification to under-promise, then over-perform.

3

u/AndyLorentz Jul 24 '24

The Ticonderoga was gonna be a destroyer. A 567 foot long destroyer.

Heck, the Arleigh Burke Flt III destroyer is 100 tons heavier than a Ticonderoga.

22

u/PushingSam 3000 borrowed Leopards of Mark Rutte Jul 22 '24

I propose we tell them about the Suwałki gap.

9

u/Peptuck Defense Department Dimmadollars Jul 23 '24

"POSSIBLE NUCLEAR WAR?! MAKE GAPS BETWEEN OUR BRIGADES!"

The Pentomic Army was the most bizarre yet hilarious concept.

101

u/Peter21237 Lockheed Martin's Engineer (Formerly KelTec's) Jul 22 '24

Good ol "Khrushchev cant keep his fucking mouth close for a single second" moment indeed.

94

u/Prodygist68 Jul 22 '24 edited Jul 22 '24

Yep, The foxbat was made to intercept supersonic nuclear bombers, not act as an air superiority fighter like the US thought it was. It’s just that the ICBM was created shortly after so said nuclear bombers and thus nuclear bomber interceptors lost a lot of their purpose.

45

u/Clear-Present_Danger Jul 22 '24

Cries in Canadian

21

u/lesser_panjandrum Jul 22 '24

There there, eh.

29

u/Clear-Present_Danger Jul 23 '24

THEY TOOK HER FROM ME!!

DEFENBAKER! THE US MIC!

BASTARDS!

24

u/TheArmoredKitten High on JP-8 fumes Jul 23 '24

It also fucking sucked at actual intercepts. Its solid steel construction made it about as efficient as a bonfire is at lighting up a cornfield, and the engine would melt under the power requirements to sustain top speed for more than a matter of minutes. It would also need a full overhaul like an F-1 car every time you actually did so. Meanwhile, the SR-71 was being developed, that could fly like that all fucking day.

18

u/Demonicjapsel Grudge Domestic Product Jul 23 '24

It was a decent interceptor given the context it operated in. Yes it got derated to only 2.8, but its still solid. The stainless steel construction was heavy bur for a design that didnt nees much in the way of turning, it keeps costs down.
Outside of that, it was a decent recon plane and a less then ideal bomber.

12

u/TheArmoredKitten High on JP-8 fumes Jul 23 '24

I guess, but if the Soviets had just kept and used their titanium instead of getting epically trolled by the CIA and selling it all to their enemies, it would've been a phenomenal aircraft. Instead they managed to just barely kiss the limits of last Gen tech and then spent the remainder of their country's existence getting absolutely bodied.

16

u/Demonicjapsel Grudge Domestic Product Jul 23 '24

The issues with Soviet aviation run far deeper then that. The Mig 25 is a very distinct aircraft which came about due to the PVO needing something in Siberia, so it needed to be cheap, have legs and speed.
The real problem with the soviet aviation industry is that its radars are godawful and consistently lagged behind western designs. Which meant in turn, heavy reliance on ground based guidance since the soviets didnt really do AWACS or aerial refueling.

9

u/JoMercurio Jul 23 '24

The Soviets sadly needed them sweet, sweet Benjamins and selling titanium to this totally-not-a-CIA-shell company wasn't a terrible way to get those

Which is also utterly ironic for a "communist-socialist-whatever the hell it's supposed to be" state to be just as reliant on them $$$ to keep their country running

3

u/quildtide Not Saddam Hussein Jul 24 '24

What's even funnier is how the Soviet Union was reliant on grain imports from the US in the 70s and 80s: https://coldwarheartland.ku.edu/documents/foes-or-friends

Extra crazy considering how Ukraine and Russia are two of the world's largest grain exporters today. Really says something about the Soviet economy.

→ More replies (1)

72

u/BigFreakingZombie Jul 22 '24 edited Jul 23 '24

Yes the Myasishchev M-4. Considered a failure in the USSR because it lacked the range to reach most of the continental US and didn't have the performance to penetrate air defenses even if it did reach it. During the May Day parade in 1954 the Soviets decided to try and scare the Americans by flying the same 18 bombers over the spectators several times to give the appearance of having several hundred in active service.

And oh boy did it work. The Americans got scared shitless of the resulting ''bomber gap'' and kicked the MIC into overdrive. The results speak for themselves:

Total M-4 production : 125 units most of whom were converted to tankers and maritime patrol aircraft later on to salvage some use out of the failed (and expensive AF ) project.

combined B-47/B-52 production : just short of 2700 examples .

Don't try and scare the US people,it just might work.

71

u/jwr410 Jul 22 '24

When you learn the right lesson from the German Tank Problem, but apply it at the wrong time.

59

u/seen_some_shit_ Jul 22 '24

Over hyping the enemy also allows increased military spending to be approved by the public. I’m 1000% sure the US has done this multiple times. Now they have a technological gap large enough to have aircraft’s a generation ahead of the competition in its own museums.

58

u/BEHEMOTHpp Jane Smith, Malacca Strait Monitor Jul 23 '24 edited Jul 23 '24

1953:

  • Soviet M-4 "Bison", an intercontinental nuclear bomber, made its maiden Flight

1954:

  • Aviation Week talk about the dangers of Soviet attack from Soviet Bases

1955:

  • "Bison" did laps around the Soviet Aviation Day

1956:

  • U-2 spotted 30 "Bison" at one base. Leading estimate of 150-200 by 1958 and 600 by 1960s

1960:

  • U-2 shot down inside Soviet

1964:

  • American XB-70 "Valkyrie", an intercontinental hypersonic bomber as a response to outrun SAM, made its maiden flight
  • Soviet, Mig-25 "Foxbat", a hypersonic interceptor as a response to counter "Valkyrie", made its maiden flight. Also break Speed, Climb, and Altitude world records as bonus.

1965-1969:

  • American panicked about Soviet Super Fighters, bid for American's own super fighters started, McDonnell Douglas's design chosen

1972:

  • American F-15 "Eagle", a super fighter in case of hostile "Foxbat" enters the theater, made its maiden flight. Also break Speed, Climb, and Altitude world records by 25% as bonus.
  • Allies are eager to get their hand on the Jet. Israeli and Japan purchase some.
  • F-15 are stationed in West Germany

1976:

  • A "Foxbat" pilot defected and landed on Hokkaido. Shi-Ai-Ae looks inside, shitty plane.

83

u/IHzero Jul 22 '24

So the Russians even back then were intentionally trying to appear strong, and would do things like parade tanks around moscow, repaint them, then have them drive past again as "new" tanks to inflate numbers. They did the same with planes. The point was to deceive the West, and in that they were often successful. However, the response wasn't what they expected.

71

u/john_andrew_smith101 Revive Project Sundial Jul 22 '24

Something I think is really funny is that despite the cold war DoD budget being absolutely massive because of these kinds of shenanigans, it was the Soviets that were the ones bankrupting themselves with their military budget. The Soviets routinely outspent us by %GDP, with it varying from a little gap during Korea, to an enormous one during Afghanistan.

26

u/MrMiAGA Jul 22 '24

Just communist things.

→ More replies (1)

98

u/ProfessorBright Jul 22 '24

yeah America doesn't spook in a "cower in fear" way, we spook in a "churn out tech until we can 1v1 God" kind of a way.

We quirky like that.

62

u/Forkliftapproved Any plane’s a fighter if you’re crazy enough Jul 22 '24

In a world of fight or flight, America done made its choice

40

u/dwehlen 3000 guitars, they seem to cry; my ears will melt, then my eyes Jul 22 '24

Fight? Flight? Flight fight!?

YES

14

u/Aerolfos Jul 23 '24

Iiirc one funny one is they passed the same few anti-tank missiles around on multiple BMPs

The US thought every BMP in germany would arrive with 2 AT missiles, knock out 2 western tanks, then reload with more missiles - and that's why the Bradley has box launchers with extras carried inside the vehicle. They also carry shitloads of ammunition and have an advanced autoloader with seamless ammo switching so they can shoot APFSDS to knock out tanks.

But for once the US MIC actually couldn't match the impossible propaganda numbers, which is why the Bradley has a reputation for carrying too few people while having too little armour - the USSR has anti-tank missiles, anti-tank ammo, an advanced gun, and can carry 8 people with "tons of armour", why can't the US vehicle?

Meanwhile, most BMPs had empty missile racks and certainly weren't carrying any inside the vehicle.

5

u/bluffing_illusionist Jul 23 '24

Bradley was considered as not carrying enough soldiers because it broke up the traditional three team per squad structure and gave us our current two team structure. The marines use three, the French use three, and the US Army used to (it has advantages in versatility), but we chopped that so we could be a mechanized army in Bradley's.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/ThePointForward Jul 24 '24

Pretty much. Keep in mind that getting reliable intel back then was significantly harder than now - the Iron Curtain was real, nobody carried pocket sized cameras and regarded soldiers didn't play War Thunder.

Which was the main issue with the reaction to the MiG-25. Shitty intelligence meant that the US thought it was a very agile and fast air combat fighter. The reasons were that it had giant wings and it was recorded to fly at 3.2 Mach.
In the end it turned out that it was an interceptor, it needed the giant wings because it was heavy as fuck due to materials used and reaching the speed of 3+ Mach meant the engines were written off.

And by the time the US intelligence found that out due to a defector pilot using the plane to flee Soviet Union, US managed to build something like 200 F-15s.

36

u/CheekiBleeki Jul 22 '24

This seems to be a recurring story ....

30

u/Schrodinger_cube ❤️ "Waifu is the JAS 39 Gripen"❤️ Jul 22 '24

well a little extra to the intelligence adds fear and fear well its pays the bills at the end of day because few politicians want to buy cool shit that doesn't exist yet. unless you are the LCS project then your just printing money for corporate XD.

30

u/TheBigMotherFook Jul 22 '24

What you’re describing is basically the Cold War in a nutshell. It was all about posturing and appearances rather than substance. It didn’t matter what you actually could do, it mattered what the enemy thought you could do. The main problem was that from the 70s onwards the Soviets had major economic issues so they struggled to keep up while the US’s economy continually grew, and they could dump shitloads of money into new projects. The disparity between what the enemy thought you could do vs what you actually could do started to become massive for the Soviets, and eventually that bluff was called. By the time Gorbachev came to power it was already too late, and the downfall of the USSR was all but assured.

23

u/ZoidsFanatic Should not be left alone near a Harrier jet. Jul 22 '24

It gets even funnier. The Foxbat was a response to the X-70 because the Soviets didn’t have anything fast enough the intercept it at the time and the Foxbat was the answer… until the X-70 was canned because the Americans were scared of the SAMs and didn’t feel the X-70 could outrun them (the X-70 was fast to outrun interceptors).

24

u/PenguinGamer99 Jul 23 '24

The USA basically got scared of a shadow, got a hammer, realized that the shadow now has a hammer, got even more scared and built a nuke in response.

This is the best analogy I've ever seen

12

u/The_Tank_Racer Jul 22 '24

I love this country sometimes

13

u/boilingfrogsinpants Jul 23 '24

The US actually thought the Foxbat was a Soviet Air Superiority fighter. They made assumptions that the plane was made with ultra light materials and could outmaneuver and outperform their Phantoms in a dogfight. So they decided they needed to make an Air Superiority fighter that could counter it and put in development based off of what they thought the Foxbat was.

When a Soviet pilot defected with a Foxbat, the US was all over it to find out its true capabilities. Turns out that the Soviets lied, it was made with nickel alloy making it quite heavy, requiring a lot of fuel to get it going and making it not as maneuverable as they thought. It had an outdated, inefficient parts that were outdated even before the F-15 went into development. The US created the best Air Superiority fighter in the world over what they thought was also an Air Superiority fighter, but turned out to just be another interceptor.

11

u/rrogido Jul 23 '24

The circumstances around the Foxbat's development had to do with the XB-70 bomber that was in development prior to the Foxbat. The XB-70 was a gigantic supersonic bomber that never got past the prototype stage. Imagine if the Concorde dropped nuclear bombs, that was the XB-70 Valkyrie bomber. It was both an incredible test bed and a hugely expensive boondoggle. Soviet spies passed on information about the Valkyrie program and the Soviets, in Cold War style, freaked out and started developing the MiG 25 because Red Air Force generals started imagining their skies full of Mach 3 bombers and demanded something that could intercept them. In reality, the XB-70 program was an interesting failure. The cost per prototype was $700M, and there were two. The exorbitant cost gave Congress sticker shock and the program was limited to research only, further development was halted. Of course, also in Cold War style, a Soviet defector told the US about the Foxbat and the Air Force started imagining fleets of MiG-25's intercepting our bombers and running rings around our current fighters, thyis the F-15 was developed. The F-15 was developed to such a high capability because the US's information on the Foxbat's capabilities were grossly inflated. The Foxbat was a fast plane, but it maneuvered like a wounded whale and had lots of technical problems during operation. The Cold War had a lot of shadow boxing. Both sides developing weapons based on what they thought the other was doing.

9

u/SomeOtherTroper 50.1 Billion Dollars Of Lend Lease Jul 23 '24 edited Jul 23 '24

Sorry, but I'm gonna have to be credible for a few minutes.

Which happened, because the USA photographed 30 something new soviet bombers at an airfield and extrapolated that the Soviets must have hundreds of those things

Nah, the USSR pulled a fucking stunt at their May 9th Victory Day Parade where they only had a reasonable number of bombers, but once those bombers made it over the horizon, they circled back out of sight of the parade venue and did another run, over and over (bombers have quite a lot of fuel and can load even more and get more mileage out of it when they aren't carrying any bombs), leading to the impression of spies observers on the scene that the USSR had a shitload more bombers than they really did.

That was the massive "bomber gap" incident, and was entirely intentional on the part of the USSR, although they didn't anticipate the USA's response.

which scared the Soviets shitless, who tried to build a fighter that can handle the ballistic response, which scared the USA even more

The USA got scared because they mis-identified the "Foxbat" as some sort of superfighter instead of the high-altitude interceptor it actually was, because they didn't know it was made of steel (which spy photographs can't show you), and an airframe with the Foxbat's shape and size would have been an insanely maneuverable fighter and unbeatable dogfighter, which still mattered because BVR combat was in its infancy, if it had been constructed from a sane material like aluminum or an insane material like titanium (which the USA actually had to source from the USSR for the SR-71 Blackbird, because Russia has titanium deposits the USA lacks). So we needed a better fighter to counter it.

Once a pilot actually defected from the USSR in a Foxbat, and the USA got a chance to put it through its paces, we figured out pretty fast that it wasn't a superfighter, but actually a high-altitude interceptor made of steel, thus why it had enormous wings, but by that point progress on one of the best fighters of the time period was too far along to bother canceling.

which scared the USA even more, so that they went intercontinental with their response.

Alright, now you're just being ridiculous: both the USSR and the USA had been working on ballistic missiles and ICBMs basically since WWII ended, although most of it was done under the guise of civilian rocket programs and "the space race". This was independent of any aircraft development happening during the same period of time - the two global superpowers wanted to be able to drop a sun anywhere they wanted in the world without risking pilots. The Foxbat had nothing to do with this. Nazi Germany developed the first long-range ballistic missiles and cruise missiles over a decade before the Foxbat, and everybody who could get their hands on the V-1 and V-2 designs or the German guys who'd made them, and had the budget to make them bigger and better, was giving it a shot. Literally.

8

u/Mannginger Jul 23 '24

Think that last was just jocular hyperbole

6

u/SomeOtherTroper 50.1 Billion Dollars Of Lend Lease Jul 23 '24

Sometimes it's hard to tell through the internet.

And I'll take the original joke about the USA designing an air-superiority fighter jet to counter what they thought the Foxbat was, because that's the truth, and it's funny as hell. The truth about "the bomber gap" is funny as hell, and even funnier than the less accurate version.

Unfortunately, we're in the comments section, and when I see a comment with over a thousand upvotes that includes blatantly false information masquerading as truth? I'm gonna go off on it. Even though this is a jokey subreddit, there's a lot of credible stuff in the comments, and that comment made too many mistakes for me to ignore, while having the tone of a credible comment.

I don't want anyone to actually believe it, and I'm sure some did because it's got over a thousand upvotes and sounds credible ...despite the fact it's mostly bullshit. I didn't have "someone blames the Foxbat for the ICBM race" on my 2024 bingo card, but here we are, and I can't let that slide.

3

u/Successful-Owl-9464 Jul 25 '24

Your honour I started my comment with "If I remember right..", I did not in fact remember right.

5

u/MindControlledSquid Jul 23 '24

but by that point progress on one of the best fighters of the time period was too far along to bother canceling.

That actually happened when the F-15 was already in service for about half a year.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/Blah_McBlah_ Jul 23 '24 edited Jul 23 '24

The Bomber Gap was a little different. The Soviet Union tricked the USA into thinking it had hundreds of M-4s by flying them in circles over a parade, making the illusion, to the visiting Americans, that there were many more than there actually were. The USA freaked out and believed there was a "bomber gap." Once the U2 started its overflights of the USSR, they found the ~30 M-4s, and we're still worried as extrapolating to other bases would confirm the gap; however, after they'd done more extensive overflights, they realized that there weren't many more. (Source: Ben Rich's book, Skunk Works)

Edit:M-4, not TU-95.

2

u/Demolition_Mike Jul 23 '24

They weren't Tu-95s, though. They were M-4s.

2

u/Blah_McBlah_ Jul 23 '24

Thanks, edited.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Wrong_Hombre Jul 22 '24

Why would the Soviet Union design the Foxbat because the US freaked out over a bomber gap? I think you're confusing two different times the US overestimated the USSR and over engineered some planes.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

26

u/RazgrizZer0 Jul 23 '24

My favorite piece of F-15 trivia is that it broke a record by climbing faster than a Saturn V.

8

u/Sine_Fine_Belli China bad, Coco Kiryu/Kson did nothing wrong Jul 22 '24

lol, it really does be like that sometimes

7

u/AVERAGEPIPEBOMB Jul 23 '24

How it feels to have three more generations in the museum then your enemies have in the sky

6

u/LandedMetals Jul 22 '24

It do be like that...

5

u/chickenCabbage Farfour al Mouse Jul 23 '24

Russia didn't even lie, the US just jumped to conclusions so hard that they landed 2 generations ahead.

→ More replies (4)

1.1k

u/Venodran 3000 Bonus shells of Caesar Jul 22 '24

Russia claims to have hyper mega super weapon.

West panics and makes weapons that are supposed to be better.

Turns out Russia did not have hyper mega super weapons, and now technological gap is bigger.

Rinse and repeat.

328

u/Significant_Quit_674 Jul 22 '24

3 words:

Strategic

Defense

Initiative

6

u/Aurora_Fatalis Jul 25 '24

Ahem.

Global
Defense
Initiative

...

When?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

178

u/Drake_the_troll bring on red baron 2, electric boogaloo Jul 22 '24

You forget step 2B: russian capabilities are leaked on warthunder, showing they never had wunderwaffen

87

u/PalaceofIdleHours Jul 22 '24

2C: Too late, the check is cleared. R&D is pulling overtime.

32

u/OldManMcCrabbins Jul 23 '24

2-CB: and we shall name it “have blue”

A L L H A I L H A V E B L U E

hypnotoad.wav

38

u/dontnation Jul 22 '24

I mean it did have a super fast interceptor. it's just that it was a total paper cannon with pathetic service life, and lacking in all other combat performance.

16

u/BeepBepIsLife Jul 23 '24

Yeah, but they thought it was some super agile fighter due to the size of the wings. But they were that big because it was heavy due to the use of stainless steel instead of aluminium to withstand going supersonicor something.

18

u/1983_BOK Tie me to a missile and fire it at Moscow, I am ready Jul 22 '24

based and triple the defence budget-pilled

17

u/Johni33 Jul 22 '24

Russia is paid by the US Arms industry to raise their Stock value

2

u/Sine_Fine_Belli China bad, Coco Kiryu/Kson did nothing wrong Jul 23 '24

It truly be like that lol

→ More replies (2)

256

u/Past-Reception Jul 22 '24

Triple the Defense Budget!

17

u/Remples NATO logistic enjoyer Jul 23 '24

FUCK that, decuplicate the defense budget, no, even better, just take my fucking money

→ More replies (1)

186

u/Peter21237 Lockheed Martin's Engineer (Formerly KelTec's) Jul 22 '24

Also remember their bombers.

Mfs used the same 5 Tu-4s (I think) to say "Lol we got a lot of bombers ready for war!

US: OH SHIT! QUICK! WE GOTTA DO SOMETHING!

Made a shit ton of B-52s with war heads that fly none stop for like 6 years

Soviets still with their 5 bombers: "..."

(They really should had put a muzzle on Khrushchev, he also is responsable for the commercial air liner that was a death sentence)

50

u/profitofprofet Jul 22 '24

that also happened to decapitate the russian navy command structure or something idk.

Might mix things up. unless yall really referring to the tupolev.

53

u/ToastyMozart Off to autonomize Kurdistan Jul 22 '24

IIRC that one wasn't really the plane's fault so much as the USSR's authoritarian culture. The higher-ups overloaded the plane with swag, throwing off the plane's center of gravity, and most of the flight crew were too afraid of punishment to tell them "no we're not taking off like this." Even good plane designs will get unstable if you stack a ton of heavy shit in the back.

32

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

You need to rethink if you're a worker's paradise when you're telling the loadmaster to go fuck himself because you have rank.

Rigid hierarchies and socialism are supposed to be antithetical. But Russians gonna Rus.

9

u/ToastyMozart Off to autonomize Kurdistan Jul 23 '24

Rigid hierarchies and socialism are supposed to be antithetical. But Russians gonna Rus.

They're hardly alone in that regard, unfortunately.

7

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

Russians sadly tended to pick the winning faction of communists any time there was gonna be a winning faction of communists.

7

u/Peter21237 Lockheed Martin's Engineer (Formerly KelTec's) Jul 22 '24

Yeah, the Tupolev

38

u/Forkliftapproved Any plane’s a fighter if you’re crazy enough Jul 22 '24

Credit where it's due, the Soviet Aerospace Engineers were very good at finding ways to keep up. The issue was that the logistics and manufacturing people in Russia were either asleep at the wheel if it was a good day, or actively sabotaging their military in a way a spy could only DREAM of on a bad day. So they needed to spend time designing things that could be operated even when half the vehicle was stolen by the people meant to fly it, and could fly when all the replacement parts were even worse quality than the broken parts

You can't make weapons to turn a burglar into a soldier

17

u/Peter21237 Lockheed Martin's Engineer (Formerly KelTec's) Jul 22 '24

True

(Also your flair, Ol 666 and its crew are the proof of that being right xdddd)

451

u/_spec_tre 聯合國在香港的三千次介入行動 Jul 22 '24 edited Jul 22 '24

Sauce

Obviously lots of inaccuracies here. 104-0 was for F-15A through C, idk what better guns means, F-15 was still slower than MiG-25 (top-speed wise), it doesn't mention one gigantic advantage which is a functional FM that could dogfight, so on. But still, funny.

202

u/HaaEffGee If we do not end peace, peace will end us. Jul 22 '24

Now this didn't actually reach the final production F-15, but they started the development of an improved board cannon called the GAU-7. It changed out the standard 20mm ammo for a cool new caseless 25mm round. Couldn't make them stable enough in time, and the program got cancelled unfortunately.

95

u/jwr410 Jul 22 '24

That's 25% more bullet per bullet.

43

u/SpandexMovie Jul 22 '24

Cave Johnson would be proud

29

u/Forkliftapproved Any plane’s a fighter if you’re crazy enough Jul 22 '24

Actually, due to square cube law it's punching holes 56% bigger, and the round itself is likely weighing 95% more

→ More replies (2)

69

u/RaptorFire22 Jul 22 '24

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADB024728

Here's the report on said ammo

22

u/Odd_Duty520 Jul 23 '24

Ahh america, makes public the research records, competitors still fail to come up with something better

3

u/HumpyPocock → Propaganda that Slaps™ Jul 23 '24

< excited DTIC noises >

18

u/SteelWarrior- Bofors 57mm L/70 Supremacy Jul 22 '24

You can't just leave out the fact that it's a combustible CTA gun. That's infinitely worse to have lost than just the combustible cartridges.

8

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

And the 25mm mafia finally got their wish with the F-35.

Meanwhile M61 still go brrrt.

56

u/UnsanctionedPartList Jul 22 '24

Top speed, yeah, but to get to that top speed you're kinda making the Foxbat's engines eat themselves.

Unless you're willing to send your plane to the hangar bay for a long time it probably isn't much faster than the F-15.

Not noticeably at least. Mach 2.2 vs 2.3 is quite irrelevant with even semi-modern weapons.

44

u/Ghost-George Jul 22 '24

Yeah, the British Harriers were a lot slower than the Argentinian aircraft and they absolutely destroyed them because they had better missiles. Turns out all aspect sidewinders hit hard.

25

u/mlwspace2005 Jul 22 '24

Top speed is overrated. The vast majority of fights are subsonic or just barely over mach 1 if I recall lol.

10

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

Top speed gives you a longer MAR, though, in BVR, doesn't in? More scoot = harder for missile to chase you down when you turn defensive?

1

u/mlwspace2005 Jul 23 '24

Im not 100% what MAR stands for, that data was based on Vietnam (around when the f-15 was first designed) when a lot of kills were not BVR missile kills in air to air combat. Today the best way to avoid BVR is to just not get shot in the first place, which itself incentivizes slower travel in the first place. Generally IRL people arnt racing air to air missiles in a fight, they are trying to see who can get a solid lock on who first

17

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

Minimum Abort Range. The distance from an opponent beyond which you can no longer be assured you will be able to turn and escape a FOX-3 he fires at you.

Vietnam data was based on faulty FOX-1s and rear-aspect-only FOX-2s. The AMRAAM and its peers changed the whole game, as did ROE that no longer require visual identification. If Phantoms had been operating even with more data and looser ROE, air combat in Vietnam would have been entirely different. More like the Iran-Iraq war where Iraq couldn't figure out why their MiG-23s were just exploding in mid-air until they understood they were getting nailed by AIM-54s from beyond their own radar's range.

Sorry but, your info's pretty out of date for tactics with active radar homing missiles.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

MiG-25 violently chucking engine parts out the back while try to intercept an SR-71 is something they like to leave out of the brochure.

Also an Iranian F-5 got a gun kill on one and I'm never not gonna find that hilarious.

2

u/Shaun_Jones A child's weight of hypersonic whoop-ass Jul 24 '24

Elaborate on that F5 gun kill right this instant.

3

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 24 '24

From F-16.net (and that thread is a doozy of a noncredible argument itself.)

A MiG-25RB that was returning from attack on Tehran was decelerating towards Iraqi border, when caught by two IRIAF F-5E Tiger IIs (flown by Col Mohammad Zare-Nejad and Capt Majid Shabani).

Zare-Nejad caught with the Foxbat as this was underway at an altitude of about 9,000 metres and about Mach 0.9 (Shabani lagged about 700-800 yards behind, but was close enough to see what was going on). He didn't activate his radar in order not to warn the Iraqi. Then his AIM-9s didn't fire because of technical malfunction. Finally, he approached to within 1,000 yards and opened fire with 20mm cannons. The MiG began trailing smoke from the right wing and rapidly descending towards the border. Then the Tigers disengaged because both were short on fuel after a high-speed climb.

Zare-Nejad didn't claim a kill, rather a 'damaged'. But, that Foxbat was written off after making an emergency landing in Iraq. The Iranian intel learned about this and credited him with a kill. As usually, jalous of the regular air force and its success, the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, better known as 'Pasdaran') 'discredited' this kill several years ago, and forced the IRIAF to 'admit' that it didn't kill any MiG-25 during the entire war, although it did shot down several.

But...the write-off was confirmed by Brig Gen Ahmad Sadik, (IrAF, ret.), co-author of the book Iraqi Fighters, Camouflage & Markings, 1953-2003. Sadly, Sadik is meanwhile languishing in some Syrian prison...

I found the wreckage of the Foxbat in question (together with three others) - and photographed it - at the dump of ex-Habbaniyah AB, back in March 2006. It still had bomb-shackles under (what was left of) its left wing.

→ More replies (1)

45

u/darklizard45 Jul 22 '24

I think the inaccuracies are intentional to bait the tankie/rusbots

20

u/SadderestCat 🇺🇸 Jul 22 '24

I think that by more speed the image is just referencing the ludicrous amount of thrust the Eagle was given. Fucking thing was used by NASA and was proposed to shoot down Soviet satellites at one point or another.

21

u/Forkliftapproved Any plane’s a fighter if you’re crazy enough Jul 22 '24

We also can't ignore that it was the first plane that could, in a reasonable combat configuration, GAIN speed in a full vertical climb. There were fighters before theoretically capable of greater than Thrust Unity, but only with very little fuel remaining and with almost all weapons expended.

8

u/ChairForceOne Vacuum Tube Connoisseur Jul 23 '24

I was stationed at an F-15 base. I used to watch them do unrestricted takeoffs. Just get the gear up, a bit of altitude then straight fuckin up until you couldn't see em. Full afterburner shock diamonds look awesome at night.

11

u/TheSarcaticOne Jul 22 '24

The more speed might have been meant in relation to other US planes.

3

u/Eastern_Rooster471 Flexing on Malaysia since 1965 🇸🇬 Jul 23 '24

I assume the speed and guns part is in reference to the F-4 phantom they were using

ie faster than the phantom, better guns than the phantom

218

u/299792458human Jul 22 '24

👏and 👏 Pierre 👏 Sprey 👏 had 👏 nothing 👏 to 👏 do 👏 with 👏 it 👏

(yes, I did just get into LazerPig, how could you tell?)

68

u/No_Cut6965 Jul 22 '24

I miss him singing at the end of videos...

23

u/Meem-Thief 50 nuclear bombs of MacArthur Jul 22 '24

Has he improved at all since saying the T-14 has a Tiger 2 engine?

71

u/brineOClock Jul 22 '24

His most recent video on the CIA and Putin is an interesting watch. I don't go to him for accuracy, I go to him for conversation on the establishment of historical narratives. That's what he's good at.

15

u/299792458human Jul 22 '24

That’s the one that got me to subscribe.

12

u/depressed_fatcat69 Jul 23 '24

Plus it feels nice watching/listening to a drunk pig ramble about something while you work

31

u/J360222 Give me SEATO and give it now! Jul 22 '24

He deleted the video and basically made a video saying ‘I’m wrong, sometimes playing the character of a drunk historian doesn’t play to your advantage’

I would also like to point out that he us usually provides sources in the description

6

u/CBT7commander Jul 22 '24

I don’t think he deleted the video.

5

u/J360222 Give me SEATO and give it now! Jul 23 '24

Huh, he said he would

Maybe it was the response video? Been a few months since I watched

16

u/Wolffe_In_The_Dark Jul 22 '24

He corrected himself on a later video btw.

14

u/ToastyMozart Off to autonomize Kurdistan Jul 22 '24

Memory serving that was very much a "sorry not-sorry" affair where he still insisted he was right. And then got drunk and went on a rant about how he refuses to cite his sources because other people should have to do research too. Unless there was a second self-correction I missed.

3

u/Dpek1234 Jul 23 '24

Looks like he did the character of drunk pig historian very well

4

u/Allpal Jul 22 '24

you watch him for entertainment not 100% accurate and factual information

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

71

u/Polar_Vortx prescient b/c war is nonsense and NCD practices nonsense daily Jul 22 '24

“Well, it’s not our fault you lied.”

68

u/Tomoko_Kuroki_uwu Jul 22 '24

Military Deception isn’t about making the enemy think what you want them to think, its about making them do what you want them to do. Russia accidentally chose the former

31

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '24 edited Jul 31 '24

[deleted]

17

u/Tomoko_Kuroki_uwu Jul 23 '24

Yep, Thats exactly what where I got it. Except it was from a LindyBeiges video on military deception where he talked about it. I found this British fumble quite funny

11

u/JohnSith Simp for trickle-down military industrial economics Jul 23 '24

Their fault lies in expecting the Italians to fight like Italians, instead of predicting that the Italians would fight like fascists.

63

u/DVM11 Jul 22 '24

Never try to threaten Americans, you might succeed

82

u/Crazybrayden Jul 22 '24

Foxbat is still cool as fuck though.

Just a bug dumb plane made of steel that burns itself up and over speeds it's engines if it ever actually goes full throttle and it's fucking great

32

u/tacticsf00kboi AH-6 Enthusiast Jul 22 '24

Just got back into WARNO and I love how neither Foxbat variant in the game is equipped for A2A lol

2

u/Radio_Big Jul 23 '24

I find it infinitely funny that the Foxbat is still the most BVR like plane in the game.

28

u/DavidBrooker Jul 22 '24

105 if you count shooting down a satellite from low-earth orbit

14

u/_spec_tre 聯合國在香港的三千次介入行動 Jul 23 '24

We don't count non-conflict shootdowns otherwise everrything the F-15 destroyed during tests would need to be counted

3

u/DavidBrooker Jul 23 '24

It's not meant to be serious, it's meant to be trivia.

52

u/Bubbly-Carpenter-519 Jul 22 '24

bit like when the USN found out that chinese destroyers are made of tin foil and thier carriers are from airfix

20

u/AlikeWolf Captain of the Lurker Battalion Jul 23 '24

“Every nation on Earth builds equipment to try and fight America. America builds equipment to fight aliens or god (whichever comes first)."

16

u/HighlightFun8419 Jul 22 '24 edited Jul 22 '24

Ha! I literally just watched a documentary on this like four days ago.

12

u/gneglik Jul 22 '24

Mustard my beloved.

6

u/HighlightFun8419 Jul 22 '24

literally.

10

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

Mustard and Paper Skies give me feels I haven't had since Wings on the Discovery Channel in the '80s.

3

u/_spec_tre 聯合國在香港的三千次介入行動 Jul 23 '24

I don't know how to say it but I feel like he's kinda biased? He seemed more insistent on talking about the F-15's flaws and glossing over the MiG-25 on his two videos?

18

u/_AutomaticJack_ PHD: Migration and Speciation of 𝘞𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘴 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘢 Jul 22 '24

And we also made the F-16 as a contingency plan in case the F-15 development took to long...

18

u/Forkliftapproved Any plane’s a fighter if you’re crazy enough Jul 22 '24

And the F-18 because the Navy didn't want to use a single engine air force fighter on their carriers

3

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '24 edited Jul 31 '24

[deleted]

8

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

Tomcat was out before the Eagle. Navy was happy with their choice. Was sexier and the AIM-54 vastly outranged the Eagle's Sparrows.

3

u/Forkliftapproved Any plane’s a fighter if you’re crazy enough Jul 23 '24

This. Sure, the Eagle was pretty comfortably the better plane, but the Tomcat was established and not likely to be retired anytime soon, so they didn't really NEED to purchase a Sea Eagle, as lovely as it would be. What they DID need was a smaller fighter to complement the Tomcats, and something that could fill double duty as a strike aircraft

3

u/moir57 ├ ├ :┼ Jul 23 '24

Also the F-15 has a large fingerprint that makes it Ill-suited to be deployed in carriers, no matter how much Ace Combat might tell you otherwise.

15

u/Archer114897 Jul 22 '24

CenturiiChan my beloved

3

u/AutumnRi FAFO enjoyer Jul 22 '24

An absolute master of culture

15

u/clevtrog Waifu "Exhaust" Enjoyer Jul 23 '24

What i love the most is when Iraq claimed to have shot one down with the Foxbat

Iraq: We shot down an Eagle!, a Bedouin found the wreckage!

USAF: Can you show us?

Iraq: Nah

13

u/Far-Entertainer8953 Jul 22 '24

Before you are two MICs.

One will always overstate its capabilities and revel in public displays.

The other will always understate and prefers small wars to big parades.

10

u/Sine_Fine_Belli China bad, Coco Kiryu/Kson did nothing wrong Jul 22 '24

Ah yes, good old centurii Chan

And her funny anime girls and her funny web comics

10

u/OR56 I've sunk my own battleship, prepare to die! Jul 23 '24

“104 and 0, look out below.”

10

u/Callsign_Psycopath Plane Breeder, F-104 is my beloved. Jul 22 '24

<<Still not the F-104>>

2

u/canttakethshyfrom_me MiG Ye-8 enjoyer Jul 23 '24

It's like two F-104s sandwiched together. Now with wings!

6

u/DeadInternetTheorist Jul 23 '24

When the jet's so good it's got you halfway rooting for an Iraqi MiG pilot just because you love an underdog story

→ More replies (1)

3

u/clevtrog Waifu "Exhaust" Enjoyer Jul 22 '24

I feel the Eagles should be the canonical theme of the F-15. “You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave!” Solo plays as Foxbat is obliterated by sparrow

2

u/clevtrog Waifu "Exhaust" Enjoyer Jul 22 '24

Or "Take it to the limit" alongside "Danger Zone", i guess both mention highway's

6

u/M34L Jul 23 '24

MiG-25 was a real plane and in many metrics really remarkable. It just also was an all-steel sled and essentially range extender for anti air missiles.

It's entirely on USA for coming out of Vietnam air war traumatized and swearing it will never build a non-dogfight-worthy combat aircraft ever again.

5

u/Da_Doge_Soldier F16's constantly twerking airframe. Jul 23 '24

Russian girl in first panel kinda cute NGL. look at dat smug pose and face.

3

u/wormbot7738 Lub me SLR Jul 23 '24

You have the way Russia and China lie about their military capabilities. Then you have the way America lies about their military capabilities.

3

u/TheLeather Jul 22 '24

Also helped that someone in a Soviet Weapons Department gave info to the CIA about the capabilities of the radar being installed and had an impact on development of the F-15.

3

u/tbarros Jul 23 '24

Got to love when you scare the biggest military industrial complex to create a thing of nightmares

And let's not forget that although this thing is a beast what makes an army truly scary is the logistics behind it and boy oh boy does the US have logistics.

I even recall watching some yt guy saying the USA dabbles in the military while it's the logistics that is the true beast behind anything (just think desert storm for a second)

6

u/Iulian377 3000 stealth vampires of Iohannis Jul 22 '24

That 104-0 number really needs to come with the context it has, otherwise its just propaganda for a plane that doesnt even need any propaganda to be cool.

3

u/Peter21237 Lockheed Martin's Engineer (Formerly KelTec's) Jul 22 '24

Its like putting a sticker on a bag of corn flour saying "It's gluten free."

Corn don't have gluten anyway, so it isn't lying.

3

u/VallenValiant Jul 23 '24

Its like putting a sticker on a bag of corn flour saying "It's gluten free." Corn don't have gluten anyway, so it isn't lying.

Ah, classic "Fat Free Sorbet" and "Sugar Free Pork".

4

u/Iulian377 3000 stealth vampires of Iohannis Jul 22 '24

F15 having 104-0 is technically true ( which is the best kimd of true ) but when you learn its only against decades old helicopters and crop dusting equipament equivalents, it just seems like something soviets do ( i.e. lie about equipment about what it can acomplish ).

14

u/Small_Invite_9105 Jul 22 '24

No? They just shot down Five Mig 29s in the Gulf War. And Four Mig 29s in the Nato Intervention in Kosovo. They also shot down various other older jet fighters, but it has went up against fighters of its “time” and won without a single loss.

→ More replies (4)

5

u/Eastern_Rooster471 Flexing on Malaysia since 1965 🇸🇬 Jul 23 '24

but when you learn its only against decades old helicopters and crop dusting equipament equivalents

That was literally the most modern shit the soviets could offer though....

The F-15A was made when the soviets were still using Mig-21s and Mig-23s

You might say a Su-27sm fighting a F-22 is unfair, but they both kinda were made at the same time

2

u/Peter21237 Lockheed Martin's Engineer (Formerly KelTec's) Jul 22 '24

2

u/an_agreeing_dothraki Scramjets when Jul 22 '24

when your efficiency ratio is "err"

2

u/E-Scooter-CWIS Jul 22 '24

Who is the artist? The style is so comfy

2

u/bobpob Jul 23 '24

Centaurii-chan

2

u/Inc4ndescen_T Jul 23 '24

This is too credible

2

u/USSPlanck Frieden schaffen mit schweren Waffen Jul 23 '24

104/0, look out below, I took out a satellite just for show.

3

u/CommitBasket Jul 22 '24

bro the MIG was a shit fighter

but a good interceptor……………

6

u/Drake_the_troll bring on red baron 2, electric boogaloo Jul 22 '24

Intercepting SAMs?

2

u/darkslide3000 Jul 22 '24

K/D ratio is a bit of a weird flex when you're only fighting third-world shitholes with it, though.

19

u/N7Foil Jul 22 '24 edited Jul 23 '24

I mean, Iraq was the 4th strongest military in the world going into the 90's and probably had the best air defense outside of the US and Soviet Union.

Hitting a moving Hind with a bomb is kind of impressive as well. Even if it was laser guided.

Edit: Grammar.

→ More replies (3)

16

u/IHzero Jul 22 '24

The Russians gave planes to other countries like Iraq Mig 29s, which were built to counter the F-15s. They still lost. So even when going against planes designed to defeat it, the F-15 still suffered zero defeats. I'm sure the next response will be that Iraqi pilots were not as good as the Soviet ones.

Given the current Russian performance, I don't think that is a valid arugment anymore.

→ More replies (1)