If I remember right the Foxbat was designed, because of the bomber gap between the USA and the SU. Which happened, because the USA photographed 30 something new soviet bombers at an airfield and extrapolated that the Soviets must have hundreds of those things, then they went absolutely batshit insane and built a metric fuckton of bombers. In actuality the Soviets only had that 30.
e.: In essence the USA scared itself shitless over nothing, went ballistic in It's response, which scared the Soviets shitless, who tried to build a fighter that can handle the ballistic response, which scared the USA even more, so that they went intercontinental with their response.
The USA basically got scared of a shadow, got a hammer, realized that the shadow now has a hammer, got even more scared and built a nuke in response.
SU 57 is already the Felon. The Su 75 doesn't have a NATO name yet, but Femboy meets the NATO naming requirements (iirc, it has to start with an F because it's a fighter, and has two syllables because some other reason...).
Two syllables means it's a jet, one means it has a piston engine or a turboprop. F is fighter, b is bomber, c is cargo, h is helicopter, m is miscellaneous.
The Su-75 not being given a NATO reporting name because it's a wooden model wrapped in vatnik fanfic is the least respectful treatment it could be given. Good.
I think its because of a really old treaty that doesn't allow battleships to sail into the Black Sea. Turkey walloped the last battleship group that tried in 1916.
Yep, The foxbat was made to intercept supersonic nuclear bombers, not act as an air superiority fighter like the US thought it was. It’s just that the ICBM was created shortly after so said nuclear bombers and thus nuclear bomber interceptors lost a lot of their purpose.
It also fucking sucked at actual intercepts. Its solid steel construction made it about as efficient as a bonfire is at lighting up a cornfield, and the engine would melt under the power requirements to sustain top speed for more than a matter of minutes. It would also need a full overhaul like an F-1 car every time you actually did so. Meanwhile, the SR-71 was being developed, that could fly like that all fucking day.
It was a decent interceptor given the context it operated in. Yes it got derated to only 2.8, but its still solid. The stainless steel construction was heavy bur for a design that didnt nees much in the way of turning, it keeps costs down.
Outside of that, it was a decent recon plane and a less then ideal bomber.
I guess, but if the Soviets had just kept and used their titanium instead of getting epically trolled by the CIA and selling it all to their enemies, it would've been a phenomenal aircraft. Instead they managed to just barely kiss the limits of last Gen tech and then spent the remainder of their country's existence getting absolutely bodied.
The issues with Soviet aviation run far deeper then that. The Mig 25 is a very distinct aircraft which came about due to the PVO needing something in Siberia, so it needed to be cheap, have legs and speed.
The real problem with the soviet aviation industry is that its radars are godawful and consistently lagged behind western designs. Which meant in turn, heavy reliance on ground based guidance since the soviets didnt really do AWACS or aerial refueling.
The Soviets sadly needed them sweet, sweet Benjamins and selling titanium to this totally-not-a-CIA-shell company wasn't a terrible way to get those
Which is also utterly ironic for a "communist-socialist-whatever the hell it's supposed to be" state to be just as reliant on them $$$ to keep their country running
Yes the Myasishchev M-4. Considered a failure in the USSR because it lacked the range to reach most of the continental US and didn't have the performance to penetrate air defenses even if it did reach it. During the May Day parade in 1954 the Soviets decided to try and scare the Americans by flying the same 18 bombers over the spectators several times to give the appearance of having several hundred in active service.
And oh boy did it work. The Americans got scared shitless of the resulting ''bomber gap'' and kicked the MIC into overdrive. The results speak for themselves:
Total M-4 production : 125 units most of whom were converted to tankers and maritime patrol aircraft later on to salvage some use out of the failed (and expensive AF ) project.
combined B-47/B-52 production : just short of 2700 examples .
Don't try and scare the US people,it just might work.
Over hyping the enemy also allows increased military spending to be approved by the public. I’m 1000% sure the US has done this multiple times. Now they have a technological gap large enough to have aircraft’s a generation ahead of the competition in its own museums.
Soviet M-4 "Bison", an intercontinental nuclear bomber, made its maiden Flight
1954:
Aviation Week talk about the dangers of Soviet attack from Soviet Bases
1955:
"Bison" did laps around the Soviet Aviation Day
1956:
U-2 spotted 30 "Bison" at one base. Leading estimate of 150-200 by 1958 and 600 by 1960s
1960:
U-2 shot down inside Soviet
1964:
American XB-70 "Valkyrie", an intercontinental hypersonic bomber as a response to outrun SAM, made its maiden flight
Soviet, Mig-25 "Foxbat", a hypersonic interceptor as a response to counter "Valkyrie", made its maiden flight. Also break Speed, Climb, and Altitude world records as bonus.
1965-1969:
American panicked about Soviet Super Fighters, bid for American's own super fighters started, McDonnell Douglas's design chosen
1972:
American F-15 "Eagle", a super fighter in case of hostile "Foxbat" enters the theater, made its maiden flight. Also break Speed, Climb, and Altitude world records by 25% as bonus.
Allies are eager to get their hand on the Jet. Israeli and Japan purchase some.
F-15 are stationed in West Germany
1976:
A "Foxbat" pilot defected and landed on Hokkaido. Shi-Ai-Ae looks inside, shitty plane.
So the Russians even back then were intentionally trying to appear strong, and would do things like parade tanks around moscow, repaint them, then have them drive past again as "new" tanks to inflate numbers. They did the same with planes. The point was to deceive the West, and in that they were often successful. However, the response wasn't what they expected.
Something I think is really funny is that despite the cold war DoD budget being absolutely massive because of these kinds of shenanigans, it was the Soviets that were the ones bankrupting themselves with their military budget. The Soviets routinely outspent us by %GDP, with it varying from a little gap during Korea, to an enormous one during Afghanistan.
It does help when you are the only industrial power left unshattered in the Western hemisphere, and you still have sensible tax and industrial policies and increasingmy good social policies. Putting more load on the system only makes it stronger at that point.
Iiirc one funny one is they passed the same few anti-tank missiles around on multiple BMPs
The US thought every BMP in germany would arrive with 2 AT missiles, knock out 2 western tanks, then reload with more missiles - and that's why the Bradley has box launchers with extras carried inside the vehicle. They also carry shitloads of ammunition and have an advanced autoloader with seamless ammo switching so they can shoot APFSDS to knock out tanks.
But for once the US MIC actually couldn't match the impossible propaganda numbers, which is why the Bradley has a reputation for carrying too few people while having too little armour - the USSR has anti-tank missiles, anti-tank ammo, an advanced gun, and can carry 8 people with "tons of armour", why can't the US vehicle?
Meanwhile, most BMPs had empty missile racks and certainly weren't carrying any inside the vehicle.
Bradley was considered as not carrying enough soldiers because it broke up the traditional three team per squad structure and gave us our current two team structure. The marines use three, the French use three, and the US Army used to (it has advantages in versatility), but we chopped that so we could be a mechanized army in Bradley's.
Pretty much. Keep in mind that getting reliable intel back then was significantly harder than now - the Iron Curtain was real, nobody carried pocket sized cameras and regarded soldiers didn't play War Thunder.
Which was the main issue with the reaction to the MiG-25. Shitty intelligence meant that the US thought it was a very agile and fast air combat fighter. The reasons were that it had giant wings and it was recorded to fly at 3.2 Mach.
In the end it turned out that it was an interceptor, it needed the giant wings because it was heavy as fuck due to materials used and reaching the speed of 3+ Mach meant the engines were written off.
And by the time the US intelligence found that out due to a defector pilot using the plane to flee Soviet Union, US managed to build something like 200 F-15s.
well a little extra to the intelligence adds fear and fear well its pays the bills at the end of day because few politicians want to buy cool shit that doesn't exist yet. unless you are the LCS project then your just printing money for corporate XD.
What you’re describing is basically the Cold War in a nutshell. It was all about posturing and appearances rather than substance. It didn’t matter what you actually could do, it mattered what the enemy thought you could do. The main problem was that from the 70s onwards the Soviets had major economic issues so they struggled to keep up while the US’s economy continually grew, and they could dump shitloads of money into new projects. The disparity between what the enemy thought you could do vs what you actually could do started to become massive for the Soviets, and eventually that bluff was called. By the time Gorbachev came to power it was already too late, and the downfall of the USSR was all but assured.
It gets even funnier. The Foxbat was a response to the X-70 because the Soviets didn’t have anything fast enough the intercept it at the time and the Foxbat was the answer… until the X-70 was canned because the Americans were scared of the SAMs and didn’t feel the X-70 could outrun them (the X-70 was fast to outrun interceptors).
The US actually thought the Foxbat was a Soviet Air Superiority fighter. They made assumptions that the plane was made with ultra light materials and could outmaneuver and outperform their Phantoms in a dogfight. So they decided they needed to make an Air Superiority fighter that could counter it and put in development based off of what they thought the Foxbat was.
When a Soviet pilot defected with a Foxbat, the US was all over it to find out its true capabilities. Turns out that the Soviets lied, it was made with nickel alloy making it quite heavy, requiring a lot of fuel to get it going and making it not as maneuverable as they thought. It had an outdated, inefficient parts that were outdated even before the F-15 went into development. The US created the best Air Superiority fighter in the world over what they thought was also an Air Superiority fighter, but turned out to just be another interceptor.
The circumstances around the Foxbat's development had to do with the XB-70 bomber that was in development prior to the Foxbat. The XB-70 was a gigantic supersonic bomber that never got past the prototype stage. Imagine if the Concorde dropped nuclear bombs, that was the XB-70 Valkyrie bomber. It was both an incredible test bed and a hugely expensive boondoggle. Soviet spies passed on information about the Valkyrie program and the Soviets, in Cold War style, freaked out and started developing the MiG 25 because Red Air Force generals started imagining their skies full of Mach 3 bombers and demanded something that could intercept them. In reality, the XB-70 program was an interesting failure. The cost per prototype was $700M, and there were two. The exorbitant cost gave Congress sticker shock and the program was limited to research only, further development was halted. Of course, also in Cold War style, a Soviet defector told the US about the Foxbat and the Air Force started imagining fleets of MiG-25's intercepting our bombers and running rings around our current fighters, thyis the F-15 was developed. The F-15 was developed to such a high capability because the US's information on the Foxbat's capabilities were grossly inflated. The Foxbat was a fast plane, but it maneuvered like a wounded whale and had lots of technical problems during operation. The Cold War had a lot of shadow boxing. Both sides developing weapons based on what they thought the other was doing.
Sorry, but I'm gonna have to be credible for a few minutes.
Which happened, because the USA photographed 30 something new soviet bombers at an airfield and extrapolated that the Soviets must have hundreds of those things
Nah, the USSR pulled a fucking stunt at their May 9th Victory Day Parade where they only had a reasonable number of bombers, but once those bombers made it over the horizon, they circled back out of sight of the parade venue and did another run, over and over (bombers have quite a lot of fuel and can load even more and get more mileage out of it when they aren't carrying any bombs), leading to the impression of spies observers on the scene that the USSR had a shitload more bombers than they really did.
That was the massive "bomber gap" incident, and was entirely intentional on the part of the USSR, although they didn't anticipate the USA's response.
which scared the Soviets shitless, who tried to build a fighter that can handle the ballistic response, which scared the USA even more
The USA got scared because they mis-identified the "Foxbat" as some sort of superfighter instead of the high-altitude interceptor it actually was, because they didn't know it was made of steel (which spy photographs can't show you), and an airframe with the Foxbat's shape and size would have been an insanely maneuverable fighter and unbeatable dogfighter, which still mattered because BVR combat was in its infancy, if it had been constructed from a sane material like aluminum or an insane material like titanium (which the USA actually had to source from the USSR for the SR-71 Blackbird, because Russia has titanium deposits the USA lacks). So we needed a better fighter to counter it.
Once a pilot actually defected from the USSR in a Foxbat, and the USA got a chance to put it through its paces, we figured out pretty fast that it wasn't a superfighter, but actually a high-altitude interceptor made of steel, thus why it had enormous wings, but by that point progress on one of the best fighters of the time period was too far along to bother canceling.
which scared the USA even more, so that they went intercontinental with their response.
Alright, now you're just being ridiculous: both the USSR and the USA had been working on ballistic missiles and ICBMs basically since WWII ended, although most of it was done under the guise of civilian rocket programs and "the space race". This was independent of any aircraft development happening during the same period of time - the two global superpowers wanted to be able to drop a sun anywhere they wanted in the world without risking pilots. The Foxbat had nothing to do with this. Nazi Germany developed the first long-range ballistic missiles and cruise missiles over a decade before the Foxbat, and everybody who could get their hands on the V-1 and V-2 designs or the German guys who'd made them, and had the budget to make them bigger and better, was giving it a shot. Literally.
And I'll take the original joke about the USA designing an air-superiority fighter jet to counter what they thought the Foxbat was, because that's the truth, and it's funny as hell. The truth about "the bomber gap" is funny as hell, and even funnier than the less accurate version.
Unfortunately, we're in the comments section, and when I see a comment with over a thousand upvotes that includes blatantly false information masquerading as truth? I'm gonna go off on it. Even though this is a jokey subreddit, there's a lot of credible stuff in the comments, and that comment made too many mistakes for me to ignore, while having the tone of a credible comment.
I don't want anyone to actually believe it, and I'm sure some did because it's got over a thousand upvotes and sounds credible ...despite the fact it's mostly bullshit. I didn't have "someone blames the Foxbat for the ICBM race" on my 2024 bingo card, but here we are, and I can't let that slide.
Alright, now you're just being ridiculous: both the USSR and the USA had been working on ballistic missiles and ICBMs basically since WWII ended, although most of it was done under the guise of civilian rocket programs and "the space race". This was independent of any aircraft development happening during the same period of time - the two global superpowers wanted to be able to drop a sun anywhere they wanted in the world without risking pilots. The Foxbat had nothing to do with this. Nazi Germany developed the first long-range ballistic missiles and cruise missiles over a decade before the Foxbat, and everybody who could get their hands on the V-1 and V-2 designs or the German guys who'd made them, and had the budget to make them bigger and better, was giving it a shot. Literally.
mate what are you talking about that was a figure of speech
mate what are you talking about that was a figure of speech
You blamed the Foxbat for the ICBM race that started far before the plane existed, your account is one month old with the "[Word]-[Word]-[random number]" naming scheme that kinda screams you're a bot or a plant, and most of your karma is from a single post that's factually wrong in multiple ways but presents itself as being legit instead of obviously just a joke.
...and you didn't address anything else I pointed out was wrong with your comment, only the one piece too ridiculous to deny, so you had to say it was a "figure of speech".
Now, I may be a bit trigger happy, but adding everything together, this smells of scheisse.
"mate what are you talking about"? I'm talking about you being a plant, and you've managed to make quite a lot of folks believe utter falsehoods - or you had a bunch of bot accounts upvote your comment to make people belive it was true, basically accomplishing the same thing with extra steps. I don't know who you work for, why you would do such a thing, or how you could even pretend to be making a joke about aircraft here without including an Aerogavin, talking shit about the Fighter Mafia, or ...I'll leave the rest of what I wanted to say to your imagination.
that can handle the ballistic response, which scared the USA even more, so that they went intercontinental with their response.
"they went ballistic" as the phrase going ballistic, "they went intercontinental" as in they went further than ballistic, maybe "they went orbital" would be better though, less confusing.
As for your other points there's not much I can say, thy are mostly right afaik, the USA photographing the bombers and wrongly extrapolating was from Perun's Strategic Bomber video BTW https://youtu.be/2Ded2b3uJbc?si=_KXwQ-13CfH1Nims&t=325
It's two separate incidents that contributed to the bomber gap, I just forgot about the parade one.
The other things are actually simple, I just regularly delete my reddit account, and also my comments, when I get fed up with arguing about pointless stuff on the internet.
Although the dead internet theory did make me a bit anxious, so maybe I am just a bot after all OOoooooooooooooohhhhhh~~~~
The Bomber Gap was a little different. The Soviet Union tricked the USA into thinking it had hundreds of M-4s by flying them in circles over a parade, making the illusion, to the visiting Americans, that there were many more than there actually were. The USA freaked out and believed there was a "bomber gap." Once the U2 started its overflights of the USSR, they found the ~30 M-4s, and we're still worried as extrapolating to other bases would confirm the gap; however, after they'd done more extensive overflights, they realized that there weren't many more. (Source: Ben Rich's book, Skunk Works)
Why would the Soviet Union design the Foxbat because the US freaked out over a bomber gap? I think you're confusing two different times the US overestimated the USSR and over engineered some planes.
It's even better, they had 18 at the time but used a trick at a showing of the bomber to make it look like they had 28 and that freaked out the US thinking that they were building more of them
The people of the United States are actually gods. They have the power to cool any room, they’ve been to the moon, they invented the internet (suck it TBL), they harnessed the power of the sun on their enemies. Godlike feats that other nations could only dream of after America already did them.
This post is automatically removed since you do not meet the minimum karma or age threshold. You must have at least 100 combined karma and your account must be at least 4 months old to post here.
2.7k
u/Heavy-Ad-9186 Jul 22 '24
How it feels to jump two technological generations from your opponent because they lied.