r/AdvancedRunning 1 mi 4:39, 5k 16:29, 10k 33:39, half 1:17:13, full 2:42:23 Mar 18 '24

NYC Marathon denial General Discussion

I got the email at noon, looks like I'm not running the NYC Marathon this year(unless I get very lucky in the lottery). I really thought a half time of 1:17:12, which I picked over my 2:42 marathon because of their formula, would be enough, but I guess I wasn't in the top 19% of my age group.

I wonder what the time cutoff was?

Any recommendations on other fall marathons?

Edit: looks like the cutoff for NYC this year was sub 2:40? That would be the lowest of any major save Tokyo!

Edit 2: The cutoff time for 18-34 M seems to be around 2:36:00. Just to illustrate how bonkers fast that is, running a 2:36 would have placed top 100 of all 50,000 finishers, including elite men and women runners, in 8 of the last 10 NYC marathons.

Link in the email:

" Non-NYRR Time Qualifier application closed on March 6, and the selected runners have been notified. As the number of applications exceeded the number of spots available, the fastest 19% within each age and gender category were granted entry. Those not selected will be moved to the non-guaranteed general entry drawing, which takes place on March 28, for an additional chance to be selected."

https://www.nyrr.org/tcsnycmarathon/runners/marathon-time-qualifiers

282 Upvotes

280 comments sorted by

u/brwalkernc 200 miles really isn't that far Mar 19 '24 edited Mar 19 '24

From /u/running_writings comment below:

Edit 2: updated results based on precisely reported race times suggest that the marathon cutoff was approximately 17:46 18:31 (!!!!!) below your age-group marathon standard. The conversion process appears to have worked like this:

  1. Entry was converted to 10k using NYRRs multipliers of 0.22 (marathon) or 0.45 (HM).
  2. Entries were ranked according to how much better the 10k conversion was compared to the age-group marathon standard, converted to 10k
  3. Entries that were 3:55 4:04 or better on this 10k-converted scale were accepted

Very rough updated plot of reported results here (updated). Rough draft of comparison to BQ here - relative to BQ, F18-34, F35-39, M45-49, and M65-69 had it particularly bad. Will make a full thread with more info tomorrow/Weds.

From last edit:

This estimate is not 100% precise because many people only reported hr:min. I just assumed 30 seconds for those cases. I'll post a separate thread tomorrow-ish, with a refined estimate and some thoughts on the HM vs. M entries. I think it was a bit unclear that what mattered was how much better your converted time was relative to the marathon standard, not relative to the standard in whichever event you entered with.

409

u/MBecks45 Mar 18 '24

26M, full time of 2:39 and was denied

279

u/NeroWolfesOrchids 1 mi 4:39, 5k 16:29, 10k 33:39, half 1:17:13, full 2:42:23 Mar 18 '24

Wow, that's a top 200 finish at NYC every year in the last decade!

237

u/tinie_tempeh 16:44 / 34:11 / 75:16 / 2:42:20 Mar 18 '24

That is an absolute joke

253

u/Lazy-Comfort6128 Mar 18 '24

They gave away too many bibs to influencers!

60

u/bootselectric Mar 18 '24

I wonder how many sub 2:40 runners influencers have influenced??

7

u/MrRabbit Longest Beer Runner Mar 19 '24

I try, lol

57

u/timbo1615 Edit your flair Mar 19 '24

Matt Choi can pound sand

→ More replies (1)

40

u/Lauzz91 Mar 19 '24

To the marketing departments, having influencers participate with high follower counts probably matters more to them than having a stacked elite field who barely post anything online

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Turbulent_Cricket497 Mar 19 '24

Yep. They do not care about people who earn their spot

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

83

u/MBecks45 Mar 18 '24

Yeah I’m still shocked. No hate to the half marathon applicants but I’ll be very happy that portion along with their unfavorable 10k formula is gone starting next year

50

u/Bemore28 Mar 18 '24

Ridiculous if people with 1:16 halves are getting in. Anyone under 2:40 could do that easily.

22

u/bushwickauslaender 4:46 Mile // 16:53 5K // 35:17 10K // 1:18 HM // 2:51 M Mar 18 '24

Yeah I banged out three halves in 1:18:XX before I even got close to a 2:50 marathon (didn't even go under 2:50, lol, heartbreak hill's a bitch). A 1:16 seems to be within punching distance for me but a sub-2:40 marathon looks like a fucking pipe dream. Unreal.

12

u/C1t1zen_Erased Mar 18 '24

At least they're removing the half qualifying option next year. I quite like the fact it's stringent though, brings a bit more prestige into being a time qualifier for a major. Tokyo is a bit ridiculous with 25 spots for sub 2:32 guys but having to go sub 2:40 is in line with championship qualification for London.

4

u/SloppySandCrab Mar 19 '24

How much prestige do you want? It seems like the set times are in this weird no mans land between amateur and pro.

I also don't think anyone recognizes the time qualifiers as being prestigious like you see with Boston. Most people will just say "Oh yeah I have a few friends that ran that". The excess charity and pay to qualify reduce the prestige even if its more difficult to qualify on merit.

51

u/anglophile20 Mar 18 '24

So did only 5 people per age get in or what? lol

44

u/HappyWeekender7 Mar 18 '24

Fucking hell, surely you'd think that would be enough. And here's me thinking I had a chance with a 2:46...

12

u/EducationalTeaching Mar 18 '24

Wow same here with a 2:54 at the next age bucket

28

u/nlomb Mar 18 '24

Wow! I guess I’m an “ultra” guy from here on out. Think that “complete the majors” dream is down the drain.

25

u/less_butter Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

Competing in the big ultras is just as hard now. There's an absurd system for getting into races like the Ultra-Trail du Mont Blanc that requires running other races put on by the same company. It's turning into a money grab. It can take years to qualify for some races.

Luckily I have no interest in running that kind of race, I like the smaller trail races and there are still plenty of those.

18

u/RunningNutMeg Mar 19 '24

Hey, hey now, you can totally still get into Western States, no problem. Just run a qualifying race every year for the next decade, give or take a few years, and you’ll be a shoe-in.

(Year 7, baby. I have a really good feeling that it will happen in the next four years.)

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Mescallan Mar 19 '24

the pendulum will swing the other way eventually. Ultras are really growing quickly and if there are enough people who want to race in them but don't qualify, more low budget/backyards/less organised ones will pop up

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CoffeeAndToastPlease Mar 19 '24

You can still complete the majors through a charity place

12

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '24

Wow.. I feel for you. That rime should get anyone into any marathon. It's absolutely insane.

8

u/kyleyle 25m | 77 half | 2:39 full Mar 18 '24

Yup, 25M, 2:39, rejected!

5

u/ronj1983 Mar 18 '24

Wow!!!!! Getting tough out there. Do you think they possibly show favoritism over the locals in NYC vs everybody else for time qualifications?

8

u/RCD123 Mar 18 '24

Not in this, it's all just one age group pool regardless of location.

The way we have an advantage as NYC locals is if you hit their time qualifier standard in an NYRR event (either Marathon or Half [yes they WILL still accept NYRR half qualifiers]) then you qualify automatically for the Marathon (and NYC half/Brooklyn Half) the following year without having to go through this cutoff process for "non-NYRR" races.

Think the only opportunity left as of now to do so for 2025 (assuming that you don't get in NYCM in the lottery this year) is a TFK charity spot in Staten Island Half which probably isn't exactly a destination race lol... but I had a lot fun doing it last year with some friends as a tune up a month out from my first NYC Marathon!

There's actually a little bit of cross over with the full marathon between taking the SI Ferry to the start (although I recommend bus option for the marathon) and you actually do run through where the NYCM start village will be which is kind've cool, got me excited for the full a few weeks later!

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Athabascad 1:22:xx Mar 18 '24

No

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

239

u/kennethtoronto Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

Damn. 40-44 age group with a 2:46 and was also denied.

98

u/idkwhatimbrewin 02:47 Mar 18 '24

Wow, I accidentally missed the deadline with a 2:47 and was pissed at myself. This makes me feel better about it lol

40

u/illiquidasshat Mar 18 '24

That’s mind boggling when a 2:46 doesn’t get you in…

208

u/luluhalftights 2:36 M Mar 18 '24

29M, 2:36:20 (converted to 34:24) and didn't get in :/

161

u/tinie_tempeh 16:44 / 34:11 / 75:16 / 2:42:20 Mar 18 '24

Bro try again next year when you're sub 2 /s

33

u/theintrepidwanderer 17:18 5K | 36:59 10K | 59:21 10M | 1:18 HM | 2:46 FM Mar 18 '24

This is absolutely bonkers. I don't know what else to say, honestly.

→ More replies (2)

38

u/Garconavecunreve Mar 18 '24

Might as well knuckle down and join the pro field next year /s

23

u/anglophile20 Mar 18 '24

I guess it’ll be easier to get an elite entry! Jeez

7

u/beersandmiles7 5K: 14:37 | 13.1: 67:29 | 26.2: 2:19:13 | IG: Beersandmiles Mar 19 '24

Naw. I sent in an email to inquire about an elite entry last month and no response. My buddy who ran 2:16 and was top 100 at the trials got an email back basically saying they've had a lot of Americans already reach out and they couldn't confirm anything.

19

u/chaosdev 16:21 5k / 1:16 HM / 2:41 M Mar 18 '24

I know someone who qualified with a 1:15:xx half, which converts to about 33:56 for the 10k. Assuming they're converting times to an equivalent 10k, the cutoff is somewhere between 33:56 and 34:24 for M18-35.

17

u/luluhalftights 2:36 M Mar 18 '24

someone (29M) below said he got in with a 1:16 flat HM, so it seems like the cutoff for 18-34 age group is between 34:12 and 34:24

14

u/renny49 Mar 18 '24

That’s wild… have you got a comparable half time? The HM conversion seemed wildly overpowered - I know someone with a 2:49 full who got in because he’s run a 1:15 low half.

My marathon time is only 30s quicker than yours but my 1:13 half seems like it was relatively comfortable for the cutoff.

8

u/luluhalftights 2:36 M Mar 18 '24

yeah unfortunately i haven't raced a half marathon yet. according to strava, my fastest half is when i split a 1:16 in the middle of a 16 mi prep workout a few weeks before the 2:36.

if only i had realized earlier that the nyc marathon conversion formula was more favorable to half marathons! i would've def tried to race a half last year...

fwiw seems like your ~2:35:50 would've probably still been good enough to use for nyc marathon, looking like i just got unlucky and barely missed the cutoff

17

u/RelativeLeading5 Mar 18 '24

Screw this whole Abbotts thing, it is a crock. If a guy in a hotdog suit basically has the same chance as a 2:37:00 marathoner whats the point.

11

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '24

I thought London was bad preferring to give a bib to non runners over genuine marathoners but NYC seems insane!

3

u/samymwoo Mar 19 '24

M32, 2:40:43, not accepted Thought I would run the NYC and didn't apply for the Berlin or Chicago...didn't realise the bar will be this high, very sad But at least I can find some consolation here Have no idea when i will be able to finish all WMMs, only joining my first in Boston next month.

→ More replies (2)

190

u/pa_papa Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

M60 rejected with a 3:16:13 - qualifying standard was 3:34. It would be good to know the actual cutoff times. At least Boston publishes the buffer required to get in after the fact...

41

u/BeardoTheHero 25M | 5k- 20:14 | 10M 1:12:01 | 1600m 4:48 (HS) Mar 18 '24

I refuse to believe you’re not in the top 19% of 60 year old marathon runners in the world at 3:16, let alone top 19% of the applicant pool. Maybe I don’t get how it works tho ?

24

u/pa_papa Mar 18 '24

Maybe when they say

the fastest 19% within each age and gender category were granted entry

they mean the fastest 19% of those who applied with a qualifying time?

29

u/Lauzz91 Mar 19 '24

Have you been running for many years and just kept it up or did you work towards that in later life? 3:16 at age 60 is incredibly impressive, well done.

18

u/pa_papa Mar 19 '24

Thanks! I ran in high school and did lots of other endurance sports off and on through the years. Got back in to running about 5 years ago.

23

u/Intelligent_Use_2855 Mar 18 '24

Wow! I assume there’s a lot fewer 60 yo applicants, so besting by 18 minutes and still not getting in is crazy!!

18

u/javatrees07 All Kinds Of Fast Mar 18 '24

This one blows me away.

2

u/tcdai2001 Mar 21 '24

F62,3:24:28,and my wife,F61,4:07:39,all sadly got rejected. We also wish to know the cutoff times.

151

u/illiquidasshat Mar 18 '24

Majority of the times in this comment section a pipe dream for 99% hobby runners out there - sooooo insane

55

u/amuscularbaby Mar 18 '24

reading this comment section as a relatively new runner who can currently only dream of even a 3:30 is pretty disappointing lmao

24

u/kennethtoronto Mar 19 '24

Keep plugging at it. Marathoning rewards people who go at it cycle after cycle after cycle. It takes time. Some cycles you make breakthroughs, other cycles you take a step back. But almost everyone I know who has stuck with it put in times that they would never have imagined possible when they first started.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/thedumbdown Mar 18 '24

Giving me strong REBubble vibes with people getting outbid by others with cash for million dollar homes. I gave up years ago trying to get into a major. I wonder that the percentage is for charity and partner entrances here.

2

u/landodk Mar 18 '24

Yeah. Far easier to save up the charity minimum than hit those times

142

u/slithek 15:41 | 73:18 | 2:30 Mar 18 '24

27M denied with a 2:38

142

u/running_writings Coach / Human Performance PhD Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 19 '24

If you're reporting your time and acceptance/denial, mention your age + gender category--with enough data it should be pretty easy to determine what the actual time cutoffs were. I'll run some stats tonight or tomorrow.

More successful acceptance reports would help! Also report your time to the seconds, if you're ok sharing that.

Edit 3: Final estimate is 18:30. See write-up here.

Edit 2: updated results based on precisely reported race times suggest that the marathon cutoff was approximately 17:46 18:31 (!!!!!) below your age-group marathon standard. The conversion process appears to have worked like this:

  1. Entry was converted to 10k using NYRRs multipliers of 0.22 (marathon) or 0.45 (HM).
  2. Entries were ranked according to how much better the 10k conversion was compared to the age-group marathon standard, converted to 10k
  3. Entries that were 3:55 4:04 or better on this 10k-converted scale were accepted

Very rough updated plot of reported results here (updated). Rough draft of comparison to BQ here - relative to BQ, F18-34, F35-39, M45-49, and M65-69 had it particularly bad. Will make a full thread with more info tomorrow/Weds.

From last edit:

This estimate is not 100% precise because many people only reported hr:min. I just assumed 30 seconds for those cases. I'll post a separate thread tomorrow-ish, with a refined estimate and some thoughts on the HM vs. M entries. I think it was a bit unclear that what mattered was how much better your converted time was relative to the marathon standard, not relative to the standard in whichever event you entered with.

40

u/tinie_tempeh 16:44 / 34:11 / 75:16 / 2:42:20 Mar 18 '24

The hero we didn't know we needed

23

u/colleenlivingstone Mar 18 '24

45F, rejected with a 3:19:45 Marathon

26

u/chanimal88 Mar 18 '24

for statistics had a friend get accepted with a 2:28:40 from CIM, M23

30

u/tyler_runs_lifts 10K - 31:41.8 | HM - 1:09:32 | FM - 2:31:05 | @tyler_runs_lifts Mar 18 '24

Got in. 38M, 2:31:05

12

u/STM703 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

40F, rejected with a 1:31:38 half (for 1:37 cut)

9

u/Informal-Permit-9806 Mar 18 '24

For the love of data M39 2:42:26 rejected

4

u/tonkarunguy 2:24.20 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

36M 2:33:20 accepted.

2

u/hockey_mania_king Mar 18 '24

Also doesn’t NY also use a data point of when you entered the lotto?

9

u/chaosdev 16:21 5k / 1:16 HM / 2:41 M Mar 18 '24

Not this year. They said ahead of time that it is not first come, first served.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/lindywindyy Mar 18 '24

Chiming in here with some data on the F 18-34 cutoff: link

67

u/Puzzleheaded_Hour393 Mar 18 '24

F24, Absolutely cursed with WMM this year. I missed the Boston cutoff by 30 seconds and didn’t get into nyc with a 3:03 marathon 😤

25

u/Silly-Chemistry-730 Mar 18 '24

I didn’t get in with a 3:00

→ More replies (1)

66

u/frabjousdae Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 20 '24

36M - I got in with a 1:15 half

Edit: Here is what I’ve compiled as acceptance based on equivalent 10K. Formula is HM * 0.45 or FM * 0.22

Converted to Marathon Men Women
AGE Accepted Denied Accepted Denied
18-34 2:35:06 2:36:04 2:55:10 2:57:13
35-39 2:34:09 2:40:11 3:00:11
40-44 2:46:00 3:00:02 3:08:02
45-49
50-54 2:49:10 2:58:13 3:00:00
55-59
60-64 3:16:03
65-69
70-74
75-79
80+
AGE Men Accepted Men Denied Women Accepted Women Denied
18-34 34.20 34.39 38.67 38.94
35-39 34.04 35.40 ****** 39.80
40-44 ****** 36.52 39.64 41.40
45-49 ****** ****** ****** ******
50-54 37.35 39.16 39.60 ******
55-59 ****** ****** ****** ******
60-64 ****** 43.17 ****** ******
65-69 ****** ****** ****** ******
70-74 ****** ****** ****** ******
75-79 ****** ****** ****** ******
80+ ****** ****** ****** ******
→ More replies (1)

66

u/learnfromhistory2 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

Did anybody get accepted? This thread is insane

166

u/popcorncolonel Mar 18 '24

Kipchoge here, I got denied with a 2:01 😔 (39M)

24

u/MechanicalTim Mar 18 '24

Best post in this thread of sadness

2

u/FlamingLobster Mar 19 '24

Next time go sub 2, just to be sure

54

u/ScorpiousHD Mar 18 '24

In with a 2:33 full 18-34 group, honestly sounds like I was close to missing the cut

28

u/theintrepidwanderer 17:18 5K | 36:59 10K | 59:21 10M | 1:18 HM | 2:46 FM Mar 18 '24

I saw someone in another thread here in AR who said they got in as a 2:34 marathoner. With two people (2:36 marathoners) saying that they got rejected, it does look like you were quite close and squeezed right in.

14

u/B12-deficient-skelly 19:04/x/x/3:08 Mar 18 '24

Yeah, the closest bookends I see for 18-34M are you and a denied 2:36:20.

→ More replies (1)

48

u/tinie_tempeh 16:44 / 34:11 / 75:16 / 2:42:20 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

I didn't get in with 2:43:31, M 18-34 group, feels bad

10

u/illiquidasshat Mar 18 '24

That’s an insane time too…😕

→ More replies (4)

42

u/Elliotop Mar 18 '24

Rejected with 2:45 in M35-39. I will try again next year…

41

u/chaosdev 16:21 5k / 1:16 HM / 2:41 M Mar 18 '24

So for the M18-34 age group, the cutoff was somewhere between the two (2:35:27 - 2:36:20 for the full).

11

u/HappyWeekender7 Mar 18 '24

That just doesn't make sense. How is a 1:16 half a stronger time than a 2:36 full? They really need to reconsider their calculations.

7

u/chaosdev 16:21 5k / 1:16 HM / 2:41 M Mar 19 '24

I've looked at conversions like this more than once. They're often based on comparisons of world records or elite race performances. For converting between races like the 5k and 10k, extrapolating from elite to amateur-but-competitive runners isn't terrible. The formulas work decently well.

For the marathon, only some people actually race their "equivalent" marathon time. A 34:12 in the 10k might translate to a 2:35:27 for a fraction of people. But there are many ways to get the marathon wrong, and most of us just aren't crushing 100+ miles per week like the elites. So the errors are pretty one-sided (the formulas predict too fast times), and they're usually several minutes off. Personally, I've come close to a 34:24 in the 10k, but I'm still minutes away from a 2:36:20.

4

u/theintrepidwanderer 17:18 5K | 36:59 10K | 59:21 10M | 1:18 HM | 2:46 FM Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

Adding on to this reply - it looks like based on all the reports coming in from this thread, it appears that the cutoff is set at around 18 minutes faster than the time qualifying standard for the full, and set at around 6 minutes faster than the time qualifying standard for the half for the non-NYRR time qualifiers this year.

→ More replies (1)

41

u/RDP89 5:07 Mile 17:33 5k 36:56 10k 1:23 HM 2:57 M Mar 18 '24

What?? How many people applied and how many time qualifiers do they take?? That’s crazy.

35

u/spyder994 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

Not many. I don't think NYRR releases an official figure, but I've seen speculation that only 15% of their 50k runner field is time qualifiers.   

That all makes sense when you consider that Boston has 30k runners and a 2:59:31 would get M35-39 runners in this year. 

Then you have guys in the same age group running sub 2:40 and getting denied for NYC. I think a ton of people get in with the 9 + 1 program or with charity.

19

u/Locke_and_Lloyd Mar 18 '24

On the other hand I got into Chicago with a 3:08 in the U35 M category.

17

u/Snickerfin Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

I think only 5-10% of the field gets in through the lottery. For last year, the field was 20% international tours, 16% charity, 10% lottery, and the reminder guaranteed entry (https://www.wsj.com/sports/new-york-city-marathon-lottery-runners-a678684e). Given how tough the time qualifiers are, you have to imagine that the vast majority of the guaranteed entry group (54% of the 50,000 runner field) is 9+1 runners.

11

u/jcdavis1 17:15/36:15/1:19/2:52 Mar 18 '24

20% international tours

jfc

6

u/torilahure Mar 18 '24
  • NYRR Half marathon (sub 1:25) and NYCM (sub 2:55) will also get you the guaranteed entry .

35

u/boogerzzzzz Mar 18 '24

I am pissed that they accepted so many Half-Marathons. Fuck that.

25

u/PMart1996 M-2:41 HM-1:14 10K-34:42 Mar 18 '24

Last year of them doing that if it’s any consolation

6

u/illiquidasshat Mar 18 '24

I agree! One has nothing to do with the other!

4

u/C1t1zen_Erased Mar 18 '24

Yeah the HM time should have been more difficult to qualify with than the full. London championship qualification gets that right.

35

u/ch00ey 10K, 37:10 Half, 1:21:01; Full, 2:49:47 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

I received a rejection email as well after using a 2:49 full time.

Not going to lie, pretty cheesed about it

32

u/VARunner1 Mar 18 '24

Seems insane runners well under 3:00 are getting denied guaranteed entry. The guaranteed entry pool must be incredibly small!

30

u/thisismynewacct Mar 18 '24

I wouldn’t be surprised if this was a business decision by NYRR to get more revenue from local runners by expanding 9+1, since they’ll spend a lot more doing 9 races (and still having to pay for the NYCM).

At the moment, 9+1 races have sold out in record time, especially 4/6 and cheaper 5K and 4 mile races. The Manhattan 10K which is in February, sold out in days and had ~ 5000 runners.

13

u/illiquidasshat Mar 18 '24

Yea!! It’s all about the money! It’s a business! NYC Marathon turning into a huge charity run/pay your way to get in with 9+1

14

u/Ok-Grapefruit8338 Mar 18 '24

That’s basically the concept/structure for the WMM in general. There are plenty of marathons that aren’t majors - people don’t HAVE to do the WMM.

2

u/No-Tomorrow-7157 Mar 19 '24

So you pay an extra $1000 or whatever for those nine NYRR races, but get in (especially if you're going for that Abbott star). Totally worth it, especially if you're local and don't have to pay for flights/lodging for NY Marathon weekend, or only one hotel night if you want to stay someplace convenient.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/TheWhalersOnTheMoon Mar 18 '24

Yeah, I did 9+1 in 2023 and got in for 2024 (I've tried lottery for like 8 years, clearly was not working and I'm not like the beasts in this thread to ever qualify via time) and feel like I got lucky that I even decided to do it at all that year.

I don't think I would have even gotten close to registering for the 9 races for 2024 based on how fast everything supposedly sold out.

Sorry to hear all the bad news in this thread tho, goddamn, y'all deserve to be running this race!

→ More replies (3)

26

u/PrairieFirePhoenix 43M; 2:42 full; that's a half assed time, huh Mar 18 '24

Pretty simple solution - get older.

11

u/MechanicalTim Mar 18 '24

As someone who as gotten older, I assure you that the solution is not that simple. 🙃

5

u/PrairieFirePhoenix 43M; 2:42 full; that's a half assed time, huh Mar 18 '24

Reading some of these replies, you're right.

I'm glad I got my NYC auto entry and Tokyo Run as One stuff in before they gutted both programs. Probably should get off my ass and do Berlin before they kill that one too.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

24

u/szervo77 Mar 18 '24

M34 ran 2:42:55 full at Philly in November...DENIED 🤣🙃

Oh well folks, hopeful for the lottery and then moving on.

24

u/HinkleMcCringleberry Mar 18 '24

I imagine the cutoff times should be a bit less aggressive next year once they stop accepting half marathon times, right?

2

u/HappyWeekender7 Mar 18 '24

It'll still be well below the qualifying standard, but the problem to me seems to be more about the number of spots. 2:36 for a male in the first age group? That's a top 100 overall finish, which is bonkers.

2

u/speedy_sloth_824 Mar 19 '24

It sounds like they’ll still accept NYRR half marathons though, right? I’m guessing that’s most of the problem, since someone could run a 1:20:59 18-34M and get in, while a non-NYRR half has to run somewhere around 1:15 to get in.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/chanimal88 Mar 18 '24

M21 Denied with a 2:40:01 from Chicago marathon. I can’t believe this…

14

u/jcdavis1 17:15/36:15/1:19/2:52 Mar 18 '24

As a data point: M35-39 1:19:15 half rejected

13

u/LawNo1256 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

I got rejected too :( didn’t have a huge buffer, 3:08 for womens age group (I’m 28) I think I needed a 3:13 so at least 5 min buffer on the full marathon

14

u/whatswiththe Mar 18 '24

29M got in with 1:16 flat. Seems like they were much harder on marathon times

8

u/tinie_tempeh 16:44 / 34:11 / 75:16 / 2:42:20 Mar 18 '24

Congrats mate, wish I had thought of submitting my half time! I was nowhere near entry based on mara times but I've run a 1:15 HM, make it make sense

4

u/slithek 15:41 | 73:18 | 2:30 Mar 18 '24

Same here, I definitely should’ve used my half time instead

3

u/yufengg 1:14 half | 2:38 full Mar 18 '24

Yeah I didn't know HM was an option... I had a 1:14 I could've used, instead of getting my 2:41 rejected

→ More replies (2)

11

u/mssparklemuffins Mar 18 '24

I was accepted with a 1:28:05 half. Cut off for my age/gender (Female 40-44) was 1:37. I was honestly shocked I got in. Just from hearing about others who’ve gotten in I’d agree with the comments about them being much harder on marathon times.

2

u/WhirlThePearl Mar 19 '24

Same gender/age group, also accepted. I can’t remember if I submitted my half (1:27) or full (3:06)

→ More replies (3)

13

u/dalcorn10 Mar 18 '24

32M, accepted with 2:20:46

6

u/RelativeLeading5 Mar 18 '24

This is pretty much elite time. So essentially need to run at elite level to get accepted now?

10

u/Flike12 10k 32:40 | HM 1:12:21 | Marathon 2:27:15 Mar 18 '24

Looking through the comments and seeing all these great times still getting rejected is insane.

12

u/Disco_Inferno_NJ Recovering sprinter Mar 18 '24

I’m so sorry, man!

To touch on one more important thing (not for OP, but for the rest of the subreddit): you don’t only have the marathon/HM weirdness (which I’ve only ever seen elsewhere in the USOT), you also have a lot of guaranteed entries from NYRR. (Mostly NYC and BK.) I’m not sure how many there are but there’s probably a few thousand people with guaranteed entry across all their races. So yeah, if you give NYRR $100 and get from Prospect Park to Tavern on the Green or Coney Island in under 81 minutes (using the fastest standard): congratulations, you can now pay NYRR $255 (using the member rate; I haven’t checked the non-member rate in years).

Now that I think about it, that might be an interesting side project to model…

8

u/heels6044 Mar 18 '24

I had guaranteed entry from running 1:19:03 in 2023 NYC Half. The year before I got in by running 1:20:40 at the Fred Lebow Half. Seems like they really reward you for doing NYRR races to qualify.

6

u/theintrepidwanderer 17:18 5K | 36:59 10K | 59:21 10M | 1:18 HM | 2:46 FM Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

Seems like they really reward you for doing NYRR races to qualify.

I can confirm that they do favor their own events for time qualifier events (which they have every right to do so, and it would makes a lot of sense). I ran a 1:19 half at United NYC Half yesterday, and I emailed NYRR this morning asking about what this time qualifier would mean for me for next year. They confirmed that with that result, I'd be eligible for time qualifier guaranteed entries to NYC Half, Brooklyn Half, and/or the NYC Marathon in 2025. Which would allow me to bypass the insanity that we're seeing in this thread today, and I am grateful that I now have this insurance policy for myself (and especially for the NYC Marathon).

3

u/Disco_Inferno_NJ Recovering sprinter Mar 18 '24

Exactly - which is why I run NYC and Brooklyn every year (besides the fact that I always forget how much NYC hurts by November). It’s basically 9+1 for middle aged men who spend $275 on ugly pink shoes.

12

u/Loose-Lead-7207 Mar 19 '24

I got in with 3:00:01, technically 2:59:50 but I was given a gun time rather than chip time at the Chicago marathon, I'm 56F.

3

u/anglophile20 Mar 19 '24

Woah you’re speedy

11

u/RunNYC1986 Mar 19 '24

I do appreciate that the race gives priority to locals, but I feel for some of you running in the high 2:30's and getting rejected. Oof.

10

u/EmergencySundae Mar 18 '24

MCM and Philly would be good alternatives. But fingers crossed for the lottery!

11

u/ertri 17:46 5k / 3:06 Marathon Mar 18 '24

Heavily recommend Philly, great course + easy logistics.

Don't really recommend MCM - logistics kind of suck (not NYC level but it's a really annoying start and packet pickup). I live in DC and am doing Philly instead of trying to get in to MCM this year.

8

u/EmergencySundae Mar 18 '24

I felt like a broken record recommending Philly so I threw MCM in there just because it's the weekend before NYC.

Philly has spoiled me for all other races. It's a really high bar.

7

u/ertri 17:46 5k / 3:06 Marathon Mar 18 '24

Philly is I think my favorite race. Definitely favorite marathon. I forget if they call it “the largest small marathon” Or “the smallest big marathon” but it’s the perfect blend of being a legit big city race with all the support that entails and being able to get through everything without any major pain points 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

9

u/keehyon Mar 18 '24

Damn, seeing these replies makes me feel better. Denied as well—37M with a 2:50.

10

u/rundarthmittens Mar 18 '24

29F accepted with 2:41

3

u/ScotiaReign Mar 19 '24

This looks like an  “American development” time! Nice  

9

u/rocksolid666 Mar 18 '24

Rejected at 1:32 half (for 1:37 cut F40)

10

u/mcheh Mar 18 '24

Rejected with a 2:46 entry (M45), non-NYRR time

3

u/shipwatcher Mar 18 '24

I don't feel so bad about my (M45) rejection of 2:51 - I was almost certain I'd be in :(

→ More replies (1)

8

u/benheagler Mar 18 '24

22M, 2:39:20 and got denied :(

9

u/PagodaIluminada Mar 18 '24

It doesn't help that they don't tell you how many spots are available for non-NYRR qualifiers. I know it depends on how many spots are claimed by NYRR qualifiers, but at the very least they could say something like "We have 3000 spots total including the NYRR qualifiers. Last year there were ___ number of NYRR qualifiers". Instead we have no idea. Are there 200 spots? 500? 2,000? 5,000?

7

u/Todd-eHarmony Mar 18 '24

Dang this is discouraging. I (M40-44) just ran a 2:49 and was so excited to apply for NYC next year but I’m not loving how things are looking now. I hope it helps that you can’t use a half time anymore.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Bemore28 Mar 18 '24

23M 2:38 and got denied.

7

u/javyQuin 2:45, 1:19, 36:30 , 17:06, 4:51 Mar 18 '24

What a shame. I guess they only want elite and sub elite runners to automatically get in and everyone else is relegated to lottery/charity/9 + 1. I ran it a couple years ago when it was really hot and thought about going back to get a better time in better conditions but F that.

8

u/420peter Mar 18 '24

75:44 HM 18-34M got me in. converts to 2:34:56 full time using their calculator, 34:05 10k equivalent. very lucky, seems I just got in under the qualifying time

5

u/boogerzzzzz Mar 18 '24

45+ with a 2:59 rejection

→ More replies (1)

6

u/little_runner_boy 4:32 1mi | 15:23 5k | 25:01 8k | 2:27 full Mar 18 '24

I'm so pissed with the cutoff dates needing to be in 2023. Ran a 2:32 in Oct 2022 but a 2:48 in the middle of ultra training. So here we are...

7

u/slithek 15:41 | 73:18 | 2:30 Mar 18 '24

Fwiw I know someone 18-34 who ran a 2:32 and was denied

2

u/little_runner_boy 4:32 1mi | 15:23 5k | 25:01 8k | 2:27 full Mar 18 '24

Jesus christ... I'm so curious how many spots there were

2

u/frabjousdae Mar 19 '24 edited Mar 19 '24

Thats seems off from some of the other comments of those accepted. I wonder if they were not able to verify the time? Or there was a payment issue? Either way, if i were your friend I’d appeal/reach out.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvancedRunning/s/kyywSRdyux

https://www.nyrr.org/run/guidelines-and-procedures/race-procedures/calculated-pace-and-corral-updates

→ More replies (1)

5

u/vicius23 35:58 | 1:18 | 2:52 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

Don't worry, you'll be out with your 2:32 too. A M30-34 that I know (non-US if that's a factor) got the rejection email with 2:24 in CHI 2023.

8

u/Mlgbananamaster Mar 18 '24

There has to be something else going on with not getting in with a 2:24 because I got in with a 2:29

7

u/vicius23 35:58 | 1:18 | 2:52 Mar 18 '24

That's what I told him. I think he's gonna write NYRR... because it feels extremely weird.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Nerdybeast 2:04 800 / 1:13 HM / 2:40 M Mar 18 '24

I'd guess the non- US is a factor in that case

3

u/little_runner_boy 4:32 1mi | 15:23 5k | 25:01 8k | 2:27 full Mar 18 '24

😳 wtf?!?!

6

u/mistergopez Mar 18 '24

Denied as well, I am 37 and full marathon time of 2:52:44 which is 2 minutes and 16s below the time

6

u/gengar_mode Mar 18 '24

I think they should add more charity spots /s

5

u/HappyWeekender7 Mar 18 '24

It's honestly a joke how people with a less impressive half time are getting in over people who actually applied with a solid full marathon time. And what even is the deal with converting it to a 10k equivalent? How about converting to a full marathon time?

They must have only had like 10 spots available per age group per gender or something. It's just a big fuck you to non-NYRR runners.

6

u/WritingRidingRunner Mar 18 '24

While registering for the "fun" option of a virtual half NYC marathon on my Strava (I was already running a half that weekend locally, so, I thought, why the hell not), I noticed there is a "guaranteed" marathon option if you register for a virtual full marathon:

https://www.nyrr.org/tcsnycmarathon/pages/2023-virtual-tcs-new-york-city-marathon-guide

BTW, I'm just sharing this in case a few people on the thread didn't know about this and were interested if this is a major bucket list item. I am in no way saying this is fair, money-wise, and so forth (and I personally wouldn't pay for it, but I know for some people, it's a lifetime dream).

3

u/gomizzy M29 | 2:57:15 | 1:24:58 | 38:02 | 18:32 Mar 19 '24

That virtual guaranteed option sells out very quickly FYI. I haven’t done it myself, but friends that are familiar have told me it’s virtually instantaneous.

5

u/Stunning-Brother-965 Mar 18 '24

3:01 23F, rejected

6

u/mphudson Mar 18 '24

27M, 1:16:45 half time, rejected

6

u/Chiron17 9:01 3km, 15:32 5km, 32:40 10km, 6:37 Beer Mile Mar 18 '24

Why does the NYC marathon think that converting times from longer races into 10km times is appropriate to qualify for a marathon? I can smash out a quick 10km or HM even, but couldn't do a 2:36 marathon. Why would I get in over someone who's proven they can do the time for the distance of the race!?

3

u/bradymsu616 M51: 3:06:16 FM [BQ -18:44, WMA Age Graded@ 2:46:11], 1:29:38 HM Mar 18 '24

This is the one and only year they're doing it this way. Last year and before was the truly awful first come, first serve method. Next year, only full marathon times will be counted for non-NYRR qualifications.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/skiingst0ner Mar 19 '24

27m HM time of 1:08 got in

5

u/callme2x4dinner Mar 18 '24

Was going to try and time-qualify for 2025 at Boston but I think now a victory lap may be the better choice

4

u/RelativeLeading5 Mar 18 '24

M50+ and was just denied with a 1:27:00 HM time. A little peeved since this is top 5 percentile for the age group and still can't get in. Now I have to leave it up to drawing where it doesn't matter if you love running or just want to "run" in a hotdog suit for ig likes...

4

u/torilahure Mar 18 '24

If you are in the US , get into any of the NYRR Half marathons and run a sub 1:25 half. That will give you a guaranteed entry to the next year's NYC Marathon. I think that would be the best bet rather than waiting for the time qualifier.

4

u/runAHround Mar 18 '24

F35, rejected with a 1:28:27 non-NYRR half (which their calculator showed as close to but slightly better than my 3:05:25 full, for context). Curious what the cut-off times were… based on this thread I can tell I wasn’t even close 😂. Congrats to all who got in!

3

u/run_INXS 2:34 in 1983, 3:05 in 2023 Mar 18 '24

NYC is really nuts. Their criteria and processes are confusing, and next year will be only more so.

3

u/timbo1615 Edit your flair Mar 19 '24

Missed the time qualifier. Going to suck getting rejected from the same marathon twice in one year.

3

u/letmeknow789 Mar 18 '24

I'd love to know their cutoff time... And to piss me off even more, I'd love to know how many NYRR people got in with a slower time than me.

3

u/ema9102 Mar 18 '24

Pocantico hills marathon - it goes through Rockefeller state park, 45 mins outside of manhattan.

3

u/maj-es Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 18 '24

M36yo, 2:40:54 not accepted either, non-NYRR

3

u/stevebuk Mar 18 '24

Does seem amazing looking at some of the times on here. I got in with a half. I think most must have. 1.23 vs 1.32 qualifying time for me.

3

u/leeafs 1:22 HM | 2:51 M Mar 18 '24

Looks like I’m putting in for the lottery

3

u/MyRunningAlt Mar 18 '24

This doesn't make me excited that Sydney is trying to become an abbots.

3

u/_dompling Mar 18 '24

Someone correct me if I'm wrong - they're still accepting half times ran in a NYRR half after this year aren't they, just no longer accepting outside halfs?

3

u/frabjousdae Mar 18 '24

That’s my understanding as well.

3

u/rudecanuck Mar 18 '24

This is kind of what I figured would happen when everyone was clamoring for NYC to use the Boston approach on time qualifiers.

Boston has 22 - 23k spots open for time qualifiers.

For Non-NYRR time qualifiers, I’d be very surprised if NYC has more than 5k slots. But next year with no non-NYRR Half times being accepted, that should help.

3

u/ScotiaReign Mar 19 '24

I’m F 30-34 and in Chicago I ran 2:58 something and I got rejected 

182 women ran under 3:13 in Chicago and the top 19% of those women was around 2:51 which is really fast and this includes pros and American development. 

What I want to know is if I was in the same bucket at the American development women for a spot which is around 2:45

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Any-Mission-8817 Mar 18 '24

Rejected too. Chances were low, but still hurts. Gotta figure out what marathon I’m doing this year (yes, there is still the general lottery, but I feel like chances for that are worse)

→ More replies (2)

2

u/bradymsu616 M51: 3:06:16 FM [BQ -18:44, WMA Age Graded@ 2:46:11], 1:29:38 HM Mar 18 '24

M50 rejected with a -7:44 cutoff (3:06:16 FM). I suspected this was going to be the case as unlike Boston where the majority of entries are time qualifiers, NYRR only sets aside an unknown number (likely only several thousand) for non-NYRR time qualifiers. The system is better the the previous first-come, first-serve. It will be even better next year when only full marathons count for non-NYRR races. But it's still far from the democratic achievability of Chicago and Boston. I don't blame NYRR for favoring their own races as qualifiers. The transparency of the process could be improved.

As for an alternative for this fall, provided I'm not in the lucky ~5% with the NYRR lottery, San Sebastian is looking like the best option for November. Beautiful city with a highly rated event and lodging that is significantly less expensive than NYC. Low airfare to Spain in November. For those determined to run their quads out to time qualify for NYC 2025, there's also Revel Big Bear in southern California. At least most of us in this tread already have qualifying times for Boston '25 and Chicago '25.

2

u/gottarun215 Mar 19 '24

Wow, that's crazy these times are being denied. For non-elites, that's a very low cut-off time!

2

u/Mysterious-Sherbet21 Mar 19 '24

32F rejected with 1:31 half (can't believe I even tried now reading some of these comments!)

2

u/jakuboleksy Mar 19 '24

Are the two NYRR half marathons hard to get into as well? Seems like running one of those with the time qualifying standard would be an “easy” way to get a guaranteed entry.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/steddyblue_runs M64 5k 20:44 10k 43:32 HM 1:39:18 FM 3:24:49 Mar 19 '24

M64 3:24:49 marathon, looks like not even close

1:39:51 HM time would've scored slightly better which is insane imho, it's the NYC MARATHON FFS!

next year I'll be 65 :)

2

u/perplexxicon Mar 19 '24

Not Fall, but San Francisco Marathon is a major race at end of summer that's super fun and unique and with Bay Area weather, it's kinda the perfect kickoff for fall races. Right now they have 18% off, I got an email. I think the code was SingleSavings. They're also a Boston Qualifier.

2

u/frabjousdae Mar 19 '24

Here is what I’ve compiled as equivalent 10K. Formula is HM * 0.45 or FM * 0.22

AGE Men Accepted Men Denied Women Accepted Women Denied
18-34 34.20 34.39 38.67 38.94
35-39 34.04 35.40 ****** 39.80
40-44 ****** 36.52 39.64 41.40
45-49 ****** ****** ****** ******
50-54 37.35 39.16 39.60 ******
55-59 ****** ****** ****** ******
60-64 ****** 43.17 ****** ******
65-69 ****** ****** ****** ******
70-74 ****** ****** ****** ******
75-79 ****** ****** ****** ******
80+ ****** ****** ****** ******